Cavalcade

1933 "THE PICTURE OF THE GENERATION!"
5.8| 1h52m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 14 April 1933 Released
Producted By: Fox Film Corporation
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

A cavalcade of English life from New Year's Eve 1899 until 1933 is seen through the eyes of well-to-do Londoners Jane and Robert Marryot. Amongst events touching their family are the Boer War, the death of Queen Victoria, the sinking of the Titanic, and the Great War.

Genre

Drama, War

Watch Online

Cavalcade (1933) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Frank Lloyd

Production Companies

Fox Film Corporation

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Cavalcade Videos and Images
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Cavalcade Audience Reviews

Lovesusti The Worst Film Ever
Dirtylogy It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.
Humaira Grant It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.
Keeley Coleman The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;
Lee Eisenberg Frank Lloyd's adaptation of Noël Coward's "Cavalcade" is one of the lesser known Best Picture winners. It focuses on a pair of families in England over the course of three decades. There's the upper-crust Marryots, and their servants, the Bridgeses. The rich family is used to seeing their country dominate the globe, and there's no shortage of wars getting fought - the Boer War, World War I - to ensure that the United Kingdom will continue to rule the world. One scene even takes place aboard the Titanic. But there are soon to be changes in the lives of this rich family, starting with Queen Victoria's death.With WWI still fresh in people's minds, it makes sense that the movie takes an anti-war stance, showing countless people getting killed on the battlefield. That war was one of the most senseless ever (and the Versailles Negotiations set the stage for WWII, the Vietnam War, and the current bloodshed in the Middle East). The 1920s and 1930s were the brief period when it authentically looked as though the world would avoid war. The Marryots, having seen the changes that have transpired since the dawn of the 20th century, can luxuriate in their wealth, but can only wonder what the future will bring.Among the other things that I noticed was that the recruiting song performed by the woman in the tavern (I'll Make a Man of You) also got performed by Maggie Smith's character in Richard Attenborough's anti-war musical "Oh! What a Lovely War".So, it's not the greatest movie ever made, but worth seeing.
Hot 888 Mama . . . since Germany had, with ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT, the ONLY foreign movie ever to win the "Best Picture" Oscar (1930). Or perhaps WINGS "started the fire," as the first claimant of this top prize in 1928. But both of these "best pictures" focused on WWI (or "the Great War," as it was called until the 1940s), while the 1933 top Oscar winner, CAVALCADE, is far more diffuse, covering 33 years of British history and even throwing in the kitchen sink! Yes, CAVALCADE is the template for PBS' perennial TV favorites, UPSTAIRS DOWNSTAIRS and DOWNTON ABBEY. As Billy Joe realized when he wrote his #1 hit in 1989 cataloging 119 items of mental furniture for the late Beatnik and early Baby Boomer Generations, a montage of headlines can be enough to create quite sentimental Art, reminding your "target audience" of its Youth. CAVALCADE is quite upfront about its intentions, daring viewers to observe a family (no doubt like themselves--in 1933, that is; AND, you have to count the servants, of course, for the realists in the audience) buffeted by "the cavalcade of the New 20th Century." Why not give household members tickets to the Boer War in South Africa, a place at the front of Queen Victoria's funeral cortège, a space at the railing on the Titanic, a white cross in a WWI cemetery, a knighthood, a showgirl, and a champagne toast on two New Year's Eves to bracket everything else? There's a continuing motif here of "ghost riders in the sky," presumably to symbolize the passing cavalcade of this flick's title. Though it is up to History to determine whether this movie OR Billy Joel's ode will be meaningful at the NEXT turn of a century (when everyone with a living memory of the events of either may have passed on), the superimposed battle sequences of WWI in CAVALCADE are among the most stirring martial art ever presented on screen.
ActionFigure CALVACADE "1933"Calvacade needs to be a necessary film for anyone into film history. Starting off with a Vaudville story-line it quickly becomes a lesson in film and screenplay history. Originally a story by Noel Coward, the screenplay is sharp and directive. Scenes are well-thought out and dialogue becomes a crucial focus. The performances age with all the makeup, but it's charming. I'd watch it again. Many times.TCM brings it again. Highly recommended.
Qanqor Well, I finally got the chance to see this. It's not an easy movie to get a hold of. For several years, now, I had had only two movies outstanding in my quest to see all the Best Picture films, and this was one of them; the other is Wings. Netflix, usually a wonderful source, mysteriously refused to have either of them. Finally, a friend of mine simply *bought* me the two films. I got the chance to watch Cavalcade tonight.Meh. I guess it's reasonably well made, for what it is. But I don't especially care for what it is. Exactly the kind of movie I don't care for, it's more a sequence of events rather than having any coherent plot. Rather a history lesson of the early 20th century, spun around the lives of two families (and to make that work, it sometimes gets rather contrived).But I think what really harms the movie the most for me is simply when it was made. The movie covers the time frame of 1900-1933, the year the film came out. And if you make a movie like this in 1933, you are necessarily going to have a skewed view of history. We, the viewers, know '33 as the year Hitler came to power and set events in motion that would lead to perhaps the biggest event of the century: WWII. But the film, of course, doesn't know that yet, so when it makes a big deal out of the *Boer War*, it's pretty weird, and hard to get all worked up about it. Similarly, from the time of the movie-- and especially the *place* of the movie (it is a British film), I guess it made sense to have the death of Queen Victoria be a big deal, but as a modern American, I really was unable to shake off a profound feeling of "Who cares????" And you might expect that, again, from 1933, the Great Depression might get some coverage. But no. No time for a trivial little thing like the Great Depression, c'mon, we've gotta tell people all about the hell that was the *Boer War*!!! So I'm afraid this film really didn't do it for me. It wasn't awful, I wouldn't list it as the worst Best Picture (I've seen some I positively *hated*, and I didn't hate this). But it wasn't magnificent.