Premonition

2007 "It's not your imagination."
5.9| 1h36m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 15 March 2007 Released
Producted By: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

A depressed housewife who learns her husband was killed in a car accident the day previously, awakens the next morning to find him alive and well at home, and then awakens the day after to a world in which he is still dead.

Watch Online

Premonition (2007) is now streaming with subscription on Prime Video

Director

Mennan Yapo

Production Companies

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial
Watch Now
Premonition Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Premonition Audience Reviews

Smartorhypo Highly Overrated But Still Good
Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!
Lachlan Coulson This is a gorgeous movie made by a gorgeous spirit.
Billy Ollie Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable
jimbo-53-186511 Husband and wife Jim Hanson (Julian McMahon) and Linda Hanson (Sandra Bullock) are a seemingly happy couple who have bought a new house and are ready to move into their new house. Whilst on his way to a business trip, Jim is killed in a car accident which wife Linda only learns of 24 hours later. Linda is clearly devastated about Jim's death and is surprised when she wakes up the next day to find that Jim is alive and well. Over the next few days, Linda struggles to understand the parallel universe that she has slipped into and gradually starts to lose control of her sanity.Premonition essentially tries to be a combination of Groundhog Day & Memento (arguably two of the finest time-twisting films around) and you can't help but feel that this was not only a brave move, but also a misguided move (if you're going to meld two really good time-twisting films then you really need to make sure that what you're offering is top drawer in order to really impress audiences). In all honesty, what you get here is a serviceable story which passes 90 minutes by fairly painlessly, but one that is a little too predictable and one that only sporadically pushes the right buttons....For the most part the narrative here is rather simple (it's essentially told back to front for the most part a la Memento) which for those who have seen Memento will clearly be the weakest part of the film. Where this film is a little bit stronger is in many of the scenes in between where essentially it becomes difficult to establish between things that happen in Linda's head and things that happen on the chronological timeline (logic would suggest that the scenes involving Linda and one other person are in her imagination and scenes with a group of people are reality or are based on her perceived view of reality).What hurts this film slightly is that it is quite easy to predict what is happening or what is going to happen; a large bottle of red wine shoved right in front of the camera, several shots of Lithium pills being shoved under the camera - it's ham-fisted script writing and direction like this that ultimately does the film more harm than good. At one stage, it's suggested that the doctor didn't prescribe Lithium pills to Linda and that if he did that Lithium would actually be good for her - this made me wonder if the pills he prescribed were actually a Placebo which wouldn't do anything at all or again maybe all this was in her imagination. The end of the film sees Jim get killed in a car accident with Linda bearing witness to his death - this perhaps explains her psychological mind-set (seeing one's spouse getting killed in such an horrific manner would undoubtedly cause untold amounts of pain and upset). Whilst this doesn't necessarily excuse Linda's behaviour following the event it does at least make it more understandable. As mentioned, a strong aspect of this film is in its ability to try to differentiate between reality and fantasy - I half-wondered if a lot of the tender moments between Linda and Jim were down to Linda wanting to try to change the past and in believing that he was alive she may have felt that she can right some of the wrongs. The performances in this film are OK but it's Sandra Bullock who is really deserving of praise; she kind of holds this semi-predictable and rather dull story together and gives a performance that is never less than compelling (it does help that she's easy on the eye and despite being in her early 40's at this point she could still have passed for being in her late 20's or early 30's).Premonition is not the best film ever made, it's not original and certainly doesn't have the most interesting of stories. However, it is one of those films that does just about enough to make it worth watching and to its credit it never feels boring. For me though it probably would have worked better by being its own beast rather than trying, and ultimately failing, in trying to emulate earlier and frankly much better films.
allyatherton A woman's husband dies in a car crash and she wakes up the next morning to find that he is still alive. Caught in a time slip, can she stop it and save her husband before it's too late?In many ways this movie is right up my street. It is twisty and creepy and had me hooked from the first second and it has just enough Sci-Fi to satisfy my inner geek.It's a psychological thriller starring Sandra Bullock and Julian McMahon and directed by Mennan Yappo. I enjoyed it so much it could have been made for me. I was on the edge of my seat all the way through and the only thing that spoiled it was the ending. It was a disappointment and this great movie deserved a better one. A great story that didn't seem like it had a big budget with some decent acting, a pity about the damp squid of an ending.4/5
john32935 There are good Sandra Bullock movies and then there are bad Sandra Bullock movies. Unfortunately, this one falls into the latter category, but not through any real fault of the star.I have no problem with non-linear movies or with movies that require the audience to think, but this movie tries too hard to create an usual situation just to be interesting but fails to add any reason for the situation's occurrence. The premise involves the apparently happy housewife (played by Ms. Bullock) receiving some tragic news at the outset. However, when she wakes the next day it is as if the tragedy never occurred. Next day, she awakes back in the world with the tragedy. Apparently, she is jumping ahead and back in time, which could be interesting, but the movie fails to offer any reason why this is occurring to this character. Is she suffering from a mental breakdown? Or if not, are we to assume that this time-travel happens to other people? If the situation is not one caused by a mental breakdown, why is Ms. Bullock's character singled out for this phenomena? No explanation is given or even alluded to. You will leave the movie scratching your head.
panther2pup Bollock is a stand out in this psychological thriller that focuses on her characters life. One day she is told her husband has passed away......the next day she awakes to find he's alive. Then he's gone again. She is confused and depressed and her friends and family are convinced she's insane. She starts to wonder about her own state of mind and just does such a true and strong depiction acting out this character. Her confusion and fear, the scene when she is swirling it all through her mind in the middle of a street.....brought back to reality by the cars horn. Good stuff. Although this is an older film It is one worth seeing. It will hold your interest and you'll want to see again.