Vampires Suck

2010 "Some sagas just won't die."
3.4| 1h22m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 18 August 2010 Released
Producted By: 20th Century Fox
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: https://www.newregency.com/movies/vampires-suck
Info

Becca, an anxious, non-vampire teen is torn between two boys. Before she can choose, Becca must get around her controlling father, who embarrasses Becca by treating her like a child. Meanwhile, Becca's friends contend with their own romantic issues - all of which collide at the prom.

Genre

Horror, Comedy

Watch Online

Vampires Suck (2010) is now streaming with subscription on Prime Video

Director

Jason Friedberg, Aaron Seltzer

Production Companies

20th Century Fox

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial
Watch Now
Vampires Suck Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Vampires Suck Audience Reviews

Ehirerapp Waste of time
Keeley Coleman The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;
Allison Davies The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.
Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.
jacobjohntaylor1 This movie really sucks. I am a fan of the early Twilight movies. I am also a fan of Dracula (1931). One of my favorite comedy movies is Dracula dead and loving it. It was funny and did not insult the fans of any Dracula movie. And it did not put down any of the Dracula movies. This movie insulted the fans of the early Twilight movies. And it did put down the early Twilight movies. But the worst thing about this movie is that it is a comedy and it is not funny. If a vampire movie is not going to be funny is should a lest be scary. This movie is not scary. This movie is badly written. Do not wast time and money. Do not see this movie. The girl who played Bella is very pretty, But still the movie is awful. They will have to do a lot more then find a pretty girl to get me to like a movie. This is one of the wort comedies ever.
gartley95 This movie pokes so much fun at the movies adaptation of the books that i had to pick it up on amazon for a penny plus 3.99 shipping. If you like spoofs this one does it with grand style at the expense of the vampire franchise. This movie and Breaking wind are funny. recommended for twilight fans who read the books and then watched the movies. Think of this like BLR version of twilight. This is a B movie so just remember that going in except for the voultori they get Ken Jeong to play the head of the vampires and he is very funny. The glowing reference is taken over the top. This movie had me in stitches when i watched it in the theaters but my dad and brother did not get it. The funny thing is that this movie is not given enough credit with it's references to pop culture the book battle between the main characters edward v.s. jacob. Even to the dance studio fight scene and the bad guys in this movie are hilarious this also has will saso.Final verdict well worth for a spoof buff
brandon-jimenez-644-272895 Vampires Suck is undoubtedly an awful movie to watch. It's another "Masterpiece" created by the Horrible movie directors of Friedberg and Seltzer. These guys have no idea how to make anything good, or even how to make anything humorous. They should be banned from the industry from making anything. And this movie is no exception. But why do I give it two stars instead of one? Because though Vampires Suck is a terrible film, its still a better movie than any of the Twilight movies. Yes, BETTER. The Twilight movies are the worst movies I've ever seen. Its mainly because of the horrible characters of Bella, Edward and Jacob who have no decent human qualities. It also ruins the lore of horror fantasy. Because of the Twilight movies, I will never find Vampires or Werewolves interesting ever again. Bottom Line, the Twilight movies are to me the lowest levels cinema can ever sink down to. Vampires Suck is better because it at least know the franchise it's spoofing is already horrible to begin with. Friedberg/Seltzer at least know that Twilight is terrible, so anything they do will be better than Twilight. Don't get me wrong, all of their movies are really bad. I just find them better than Twilight will ever be.
djay782 With one hand, I can count how many times I have laughed in this movie. This number is one. The one time I laughed was when that black vampire said this:"I got the munchies. You know what can solve it?" "Cheetos?"-random guy"Thanks man. You're alright with me."I like that they focused Twilight a bit more and got people that actually looked like Edward and Bella. But that type of improvement is like saying that you killed one ant that is part of a 10,000 ant colony. This movie references pop culture in no way that is clever, smart, sneaky or even funny. They say a name of a famous person and point off screen, and it cuts to an impersonator of that said person. I bet that the impersonator's resume will only list this movie.I think that the script was written on a small square napkin while in the waiting room when the directors were about to pitch this idea to Fox. This movie is killing cinema. To think that this beat Scott Pilgrim vs the World on its opening day. Scott Pilgrim vs the World had more potential in the opening credits than Vampire Sucks in its entirety. Ignore this movie. Permanently.