Gunpowder

2017

Seasons & Episodes

  • 1
6.5| TV-MA| en| More Info
Released: 21 October 2017 Ended
Producted By: Kudos
Country: United Kingdom
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05j1bc9
Info

London, 1605. Robert Catesby, a 33-year old Warwickshire gentleman, devises a plot to blow up Parliament and kill the King.

Watch Online

Gunpowder (2017) is now streaming with subscription on Max

Director

Production Companies

Kudos

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Gunpowder Videos and Images
View All

Gunpowder Audience Reviews

More Review
Micitype Pretty Good
Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!
Neive Bellamy Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.
Kaelan Mccaffrey Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.
agletdave-21745 I guess I don't understand why you would make a historical docu-drama about overmatched and overpowered figures that fail miserably at every decision and action they take, culminating in their horrific termination. I guess we're supposed to be entertained watching the evil villains repeatedly win with smug faces. Then end the series with literally no conception as to how these peoples ill-fated efforts ever helped anyone or thing in the course of history. Maybe they did, but this series offers none of that. Just brutally depressing, and The End.
bossbrettrogers I was excited to see a historical portrayal, which I guess is a fair example of what I saw. However the constant beating of the "poor catholic" drum rings very loudly for a largely oppressive regime. One acknowledgment of Spanish - read foreign - Catholics torturing Protestants, is not really the kind of honesty required of a historical drama.
timsmith37 Notice there is a word missing from the title? That's right Plot. The Gunpowder Plot was a conspiracy, and a conspiracy by definition is not all about one person. Thirteen men plotted to blow up the King and government, kidnap the princess royal, foment an armed rebellion and seize the reigns of state with the aid of a foreign power. It was daring, almost certainly stupid and heroically irresponsible.Robert Catesby is important yes, because he had the vision and the charisma to persuade twelve very different individuals to sign up for this madcap scheme. But that is part of the problem here: the vision is elusive and, in Kit Harrington's stolid performance there is precious little charisma. As for the remaining conspirators, they are blanks, even Guy Fawkes is nothing more than a by-the-numbers Tom Hardy tribute act. We know nothing about them or what drew them into the plot. In focussing so exclusively on the part played by his aristocratic ancestor, Harrington does not just do a disservice to the other conspirators (half of whom do not get speaking parts), he also drains all the tension from the conspiracy storyline. There should be clashing personalities and differing agendas, paranoia and suspicions, false starts and difficulties encountered; above all as the conspiracy reaches it's climax there should be jangling nerves. It's hard to care about the inner turmoil of characters you have not been properly introduced to, and in fairness the script does not even make the attempt.Instead we get spurious action sequences, such as Catesby's rescue of John Gerard, who actually escaped from the Tower a decade earlier and without Catesby's assistance, and hackneyed Hollywood moments, such as the climatic sequence when Butch Catesby and the Wintourdance Kid charge out in slow motion onto the guns of the Bolivian police force.Above all the focus is on Catesby and his motivations, all seen through a prism of modern sensibilities and contemporary relevance. And that again is a problem, as the history gets mucked around quite a lot in order to make these points. If you are going to depict atrocities in prurient detail and justify them as providing the context for your character's actions, then you can expect to be called out if you over-egg the pudding.The look of the show is good, if a little underlit, but the script is hack work and the performances, for the most part (Liv Tyler as Anne Vaux is a luminous exception) either soapily two-dimensional or pantomime broad. The ubiquitous Gatiss renders a particularly ripe King Rat as that fascinating statesman Robert Cecil. (Historical accuracy would incidentally have been better served by a shorter Cecil and a taller Catesby.)Since Harrington is milking his moment in the sun to get vanity projects commissioned on the lives of his ancestors, I shall look forward with eager anticipation to a three-part drama on the inventor of the flush toilet, an achievement worthy of celebration. Would that someone at the BBC had pulled the chain on this production.
CartlinK Yet another series that is basically the SAME formula seen in EVERY series these days. Let's see how much torture, violence and gore we can show. Then make sure you stretch out the violence much as possible, showing every single moment of pain. Boring because you can pretty much find the same thing in every new show these days.The story-line is incidental, it's all an excuse for the violent parts.