A Passage to India

1984 "David Lean, the Director of "Doctor Zhivago", "Lawrence of Arabia" and "The Bridge on the River Kwai", invites you on . ."
7.3| 2h43m| PG| en| More Info
Released: 14 December 1984 Released
Producted By: EMI Films
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Set during the period of growing influence of the Indian independence movement in the British Raj, the story begins with the arrival in India of a British woman, Miss Adela Quested, who is joining her fiancé, a city magistrate named Ronny Heaslop. She and Ronny's mother, Mrs. Moore, befriend an Indian doctor, Aziz H. Ahmed.

Watch Online

A Passage to India (1984) is currently not available on any services.

Director

David Lean

Production Companies

EMI Films

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
A Passage to India Videos and Images
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

A Passage to India Audience Reviews

ShangLuda Admirable film.
Chirphymium It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional
Ava-Grace Willis Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.
Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.
arjunflamingfeather The answer to a movie is like icing on a pudding with sugar coating that tastes sweet to the tongue and smells like frosting on a cake but in 'A Passage To India' the 'London Bridge is falling down, falling down' does not make sense because colonial India had the government in the British control with third world Indians who learned the first English from the British. Arguments like for our sake sums foreign educated elites like the pioneers of certain institutions whom have trusted us with bringing prosperity to the Ashram where we've studied did not allow us to leave but to take a trust to return. Returning or the passage to the Ashram is without furthering the influence of the outside world at the Institutional level. The warm receptions of a Naipaul Classic novel at universities though not in the syllabus is the academic assurance that 'a passage to India' is a masterpiece in adventure.
PWNYCNY The British colonial authorities use a contrived incident to stage a show trial to prove Indian inferiority and thereby further justify Britain's continued colonial occupation of India. Through clever directing, this movie appeals to the audience's sense of outrage at the British who are impervious to the loud and widespread demands that they leave India. The tension between the Indians and English soon becomes apparent. it is this tension that becomes the basis for the drama that unfolds. A young woman arrives in India and confronted by her own sexuality has a mental breakdown and accuses her companion, an Indian physician, of attempted rape. This allegation further widens the rift between the Indians and the British, and intensifies calls for the British to leave. This in turn makes the British even more determined to put the doctor on trial and get a conviction. The Indian defense counsel considered the trial a sham, protests get louder, yet the British continue undaunted. This sets the stage for even more dramatics, which will not be discussed here. To find out the exciting conclusion to this story, and how tensions,, get resolved, watch the movie. This movie is a great work of art.
snorlax3111984 Pros 1. I can definitely see why Peggy Ashcroft won a Supporting Actress Oscar for her role. She stands up for the rights of local Indians to be treated as human beings but does so without losing the decency and dignity expected of a British woman. It doesn't surprise me at all that Mrs. Moore could inspire a huge crowd to call out her name in desire for her to return.2. A Passage To India was Sir David Lean's cinematic swan song and his first film in 14 years but he showed no sign of rusting with age. The visuals in this film are as unforgettable as any scene of the Middle East in Lawrence Of Arabia or of Russia in Dr. Zhivago. Lean also wrote the screenplay and the dialogue is endlessly fascinating. 3. Sir Alec Guinness is no stranger to Lean films and he really gets a plum role as Professor Godbole. Godbole's insistence on destiny sometimes makes him seem indifferent and uncaring (especially with his refusal to help Dr. Aziz) but there seems to be some truth to what he preaches. It's too bad a scene of Godbole performing a Hindu dance was cut from the movie.4. I liked that they didn't make Ronnie a complete monster, he just wants to act in a way that allows him to maintain his job. To his credit, he does apologize to his mother for a particularly rude display in front of Mrs. Moore's new Indian friends. He also deserves credit for taking it so well when Adela keeps changing her mind on whether to marry him.5. I am a big fan of Keeping Up Appearances so I was delighted when I saw Clive Swift was in this movie. He was in it very briefly but I relished every appearance he made. His character appears to be single (if only Richard Bucket were so lucky). I liked that Swift's character doesn't really say anything anti-Indian. Most of his lines are about concern for Adela or Ronnie's health (Clive Swift plays a doctor) and a brief conversation with the head of The British in India.6. When the police come to arrest Dr. Aziz he moves to flee but Richard the kind teacher tells him "don't act like a criminal". I wish OJ Simpson had a friend like that. There is some similarities between Dr. Aziz being accused of raping a Caucasian woman and OJ being accused of killing 2 Caucasians. They both certainly causes a lot of racial tension. At least Dr. Aziz's acquittal was more accepted and less suspicious.7. I loved how Godbole honored Mrs. Moore as she took the departing train ride. The only actor to win an Oscar for a Sir David Lean film saluting the only actress to win an Oscar for a Sir David Lean Film.8. Best Line Any line spoken by Clive Swift's characterCons: 1. Sir Alec Guinness is a great actor but did he have to play an Indian? Is their no caucasian role he could have taken?2. I would have liked more information on what happens to Adela in the years after the trial. I don't think it's even mentioned if she left India. After the ordeal at the caves she doesn't seem to have a lot to do until her big scene at the trial. 3. Even in their most angry state, I have a hard time believing a British woman in the 20's would say "b----" in public4. I don't get why the hotshot lawyer charges Dr. Aziz 20,000 pounds after the acquittal. It was clearly established the lawyer would do it pro bono. Dr. Aziz refuses Adela's aid in paying the lawyer but it's not mentioned how Dr. Aziz pays the fee.
TriggerPullerUSMC I enjoyed the film but not the story. I have been to India many times for work and I am fascinated by its history. I realize this isn't a historical film but it did capture the time of the Brit Raj rather well. I also saw some of the typical Western Traveler that gets caught up in the social views and their feeling of pity for the Indian. No need they are a strong people. Anyhow it bugged me that they used Alec Guiness for Godbole. I kept thinking WTH is he doing. He added nothing and it could have been done much better by any of Bollywoods top tier. I just couldn't get over his being there. And the scene at the caves was painful the acting forced. I still have no idea what she was doing they paid no real attention to flesh out what went on with her. A missed opportunity. Anyhow, it is a good movie to see what life was like at the time but the story and directing was pretty bad. Not to mention Alec in his creepy scenes.