Conversations with Other Women

2006 "There are two sides to every love story."
6.9| 1h24m| R| en| More Info
Released: 11 August 2006 Released
Producted By: Prophecy Pictures Ltd.
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Reunited at a wedding after many years, former lovers again feel the pull of a mutual attraction neither is willing to admit. Escaping the reception for the privacy of a hotel room, the unnamed pair explore the choices of the past that led them to the present.

Genre

Drama, Romance

Watch Online

Conversations with Other Women (2006) is now streaming with subscription on Freevee

Director

Hans Canosa

Production Companies

Prophecy Pictures Ltd.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Conversations with Other Women Videos and Images
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Conversations with Other Women Audience Reviews

WasAnnon Slow pace in the most part of the movie.
Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated
Brainsbell The story-telling is good with flashbacks.The film is both funny and heartbreaking. You smile in a scene and get a soulcrushing revelation in the next.
Justina The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.
pufflesmoke This split screen hard to watch. That combined with boring uninteresting dialogue that had no direction was so bland! The acting was not horrific but a drag where both actors have completed better performances in the past. Carla Brunis singing killed me in a bad way and hurt was irksome Overall my expectations were high and were let down a load and I can no believe the ratings people have delivered so far. I thought humanity had better taste yet I seem to have been let down Once again. In future I will be sure to steer clear of this director as this film Is an insult to the film industry. All in all it is an incredibly boring movie that Up me to sleep in no time. I don't even know why I bothered to write this review Considering I hated it so much! Don't watch this movie whatever you do!
rainmanrey Watching this movie was like watching two incredibly average films at the same time. The story was predictable while the filming and editing was original but annoying. The chemistry worked but still a bit awkward. It wasn't the worst film ever but I could have found something better to do with my evening, I recommend skipping this one as I actually stopped the film at one point to decide if I should go on... If I wasn't twenty minutes out I would have jumped ship, instead I saw what was the only likely ending, as predictable as the credits themselves. So in the end, find something that does not try so hard with artistic camera work and instead makes us love the characters and the story which I found both lacking.
rowmorg In this sex film I was expecting to glimpse again Helena B-Carter's spectacularly hirsute nether region, which she showed us during the bed scene as Lucy Honeychurch in A Room with a View. Large, black and bulging, it had a powerful and unforgettable screen presence far greater than that of its distinguished owner, who is descended from a long line of top bankers and Tory party bosses. Here is another untrained actress (like Liz Taylor), dwarfish in stature, who appears on the screen before us purely through advantages of social status, wealth and hairiness. Because Ms Bonham-Carter was playing an adulterous wife who conducts a one-night sex-romp with her divorced husband, one might have expected to glimpse a little of her anatomy, but alas! we are now in the Age of Morality, in which any kind of violence and mayhem is permissible, but birthday suits are verboten. Real actors, and a real director, would have conducted much of this silly little film in the nude, just as it would have taken place in life. The whole film consists of dialogue between the pair, but NEVER while having sexual intercourse together. Talking during sex on screen is now as forbidden as showing any actress anywhere near a bed used to be in the 1950s.It is regrettable that in a film wholly concerned with sexual promiscuity, no sex is shown, nor any crucial part of the human anatomy, but that is trivial compared to the extraordinary methodology employed here. The entire picture --- yes, the whole duration --- is filmed with two cameras and presented in split-screen format. After viewing it, we felt like rushing to the optometrist for medical treatment. If you enjoy seeing films about sex that include no sex and no nudity, and are willing to risk an attack of schizophrenia induced by double-filming, do rush to see this one. Otherwise, avoid like HIV.
flickernatic I approached this movie with high expectations but was soon disappointed. The split screen turns out to be simply distracting, especially when passers-by cross in front of the main characters to no clear purpose. This cinematic technique begins to feel like the director's indulgence - and never mind the audience. Worse still, the characters are so poorly matched - a rather aristocratic looking (in a stereotypical 'English' way) female with a guy who looks as though he just came from standing in with the Monkees. Wooden acting, dreary dialogue and a complete lack of spark between the actors.A lot of unkind adjectives could be attached to this movie - and have been - but in simple terms it is just colossally boring.