Creepshow 3

2006 "The most fun you'll ever have being scared!"
3.2| 1h44m| R| en| More Info
Released: 24 April 2006 Released
Producted By: Creepy Film Productions
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

This follow-up to the George Romero/Stephen King-launched anthology series features five new tales of horror and a wraparound. The main stories deal with alternative realities ("Alice"), possessed communication devices ("The Radio"), vampires and serial killers in lust ("Call Girl"), mad inventors ("The Professor's Wife"), and hauntings from beyond the grave ("Haunted Dog").

Genre

Horror, Comedy

Watch Online

Creepshow 3 (2006) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Ana Clavell, James Glenn Dudelson

Production Companies

Creepy Film Productions

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Creepshow 3 Videos and Images
View All

Creepshow 3 Audience Reviews

More Review
Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much
Ceticultsot Beautiful, moving film.
Invaderbank The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.
Tayyab Torres Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.
poe426 While I wouldn't call the original CREEPSHOW "inspired," it was a masterpiece compared to this one. CREEPSHOW gave us two segments worth mentioning: "THE CRATE" and "THE LONESOME DEATH OF JORDY VERRILL." Even CREEPSHOW II boasted some very solid direction, though the stories weren't as much fun as the stories in the original. (Oddly- or not-, the two best stories, "THE LONESOME DEATH OF JORDY VERRILL" in CREEPSHOW and "THE RAFT" in CREEPSHOW II, were both variations on a familiar theme- i.e.; THE BLOB.) CREEPSHOW III offers quite literally NOTHING of even passing interest: the stories are poorly conceived and even more poorly produced. CREEPSHOW would've made a good TV series if done right (and in the vein of the original), but CREEPSHOW III seems to have put a stake through the heart of that notion.
buddypatrick Creepshow III is not as bad as its infamous reputation. Taking into account the creators behind this film are in fact those responsible for the abomination known as Day of the Dead 2: Contagium, their second attempt at a devote homage to Romero is in fact successful - - as a devote Creepshow/Romero fan; it really is not that bad of a film.The original Creepshow is fantastic as is Creepshow 2 and Tales from the Darkside is also another entertaining segmented hit from the same group of creators. I personally love these movies; they're parodies and spoofs of their inspiration source yet faithful homages at the same time so wonderfully portrayed it brings back childhood memories of being scared of nonsensical jibber jabber such as ghosts and zombies and monsters hiding under the bed. In the 80's and 90's Romero and King worked alongside on these films inspired by E.C comics, shorts by Stephen King - what have you. Let's look at Creepshow III in that way; after Romero and King's series of segment-based horror/comedy film they therefore set new grounds for new film makers to indulge and be inspired by and I think Creepshow III is exactly that - - taking into account its restrictions of pushing boundaries which I am sure the film makers would have intended to do but this is clearly an incredibly low budget film so there are bound to be set backs in script, acting, special effects … even though I don't think those particular structures in the film are that bad at all. AJ Bowen in "The Radio" is particularly good as is Camille Lacey in "Call Girl" as a serial killing prostitute. My main point is that there are movies out there that are far worse than this. I have intentionally seen a lot of horrible movies so I can appreciate a wider range of cinema, some movies I have seen have $0 budgets and are shot on a digital home videos; Ben & Arthur (2002) comes to mind, and then there is Tommy Wiseau's The Room (2003) that is screened all the time at my local cult theatre so teenagers can get drunk/stoned and laugh at how appallingly awful everything about it truly is. Think Monster A Go-Go (1965) where the film ran out of funding, so the movie abruptly halts halfway and finalises the ending with stock footage. What about Santa With Muscles? Anything by Ulli Lommel is also worth burning and burying – my point being is that Creepshow III suffers a bad rap and I fail to see why, the first segment is probably the worst segment of all three Creepshow movies perhaps, but the film picks up with The Radio, Call Girl (which is reminiscent of the first Creepshow's "Father's Day" and "Something to Tide You Over" and the second movie's "The Hitchhiker) and even "The Professor's Wife" has a good sense of gory humour to it. After all this movie *is* intended to be a comedy/horror – it is probably more comedy based though with minor childlike horror elements. It reminds me of Goosebumps or Freaky Stories.So did I enjoy Creepshow III? Apart from the failure of a coherent "Alice in Wonderland" reference that is the first segment "Alice" (even though there is good humour behind it) the movie is actually quite funny particularly "The Radio" and "Call Girl" being my favourite segments. The movie is a good cousin to the original two films and as a devote Romero/King/Creepshow fan I say that in all confidence. If one had a broad and open mind toward low budget cinema then you would understand that the infamous bad reviews that Creepshow III receives are in fact inflated and exaggerated by the horror community that are forever expected every horror movie that is released to be the next Rosemarie's Baby or Halloween, people are always demanding too much of horror.The reason I love horror so much is its capability to be so diverse and so broad that one can manipulate fantasy, mystery, action, sci-fi into the mixing pot and whatever the outcome you can still optionally chose comedy as its strongest feature. So whether you think Creepshow III is good or bad, just take this film buff's advice; there is always *always* something far worse than whatever you have seen, so keep looking – when you find that ultimate bottom of the pit failure of celluloid it will help you appreciate movies like Creepshow III more.
AlphaV37 Come on.. this was not that bad. Was it creepshow 1.. no.. But it was not as bad as creepshow 2.. This creepshow is more like well something that you would see on TV but not good enough for the theater but it was OK. It kept my interest although i can say it was not "GREAT". I think the people who say its this bad were expecting something like creepshow 1.. Sorry folks looks like we wont be seeing something like that again anytime soon.Its OK not something I would rent but if you see it on TV its OK. SO if you have nothing to do or just see it on TV give it a try but other than that. thats about all I can say.
Spoonhui This film didn't exactly thrill me to bits neither did it make me want to smash it up. The acting in this film goes from bad-worse-bad-okay-bad. The five stories in this film are incredibly boring and terribly written and virtually no gore. The only story I liked was the proffeser's wife which you could probably watch for free, apart from that the stories seemed like something done by a fool.And considering they had a (supposed) budget of £2,000,000 - $3,700,000 you would expect a bit more. all in all this film is definitely not worth buying, maybe not even worth renting but if you see it in the charity shop for £0.10p you may wanna give it a go. ACTING = 2/10 Directing = 2/10 Story/plot = 0.5/10 Effort = 3/10