Father's Garden: The Love of My Parents

2013
7.2| 1h33m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 13 February 2013 Released
Producted By: Peter Liechti Filmproduktion GmbH
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

The father tends his large garden with the utmost precision. The mother irons shirts and regrets that the father never wears T-shirts. The father likes order, always knows best, and has everything under control. The mother prays and talks of her loneliness. The two are fundamentally different, have opposing views and interests, and have been married for 62 years. Closely knit yet poles apart: this is the ambivalent standpoint from which Peter Liechti turns his lens on his elderly parents and the story of their marriage. Alongside conversations that shift from slapstick to insanity and observations of daily life in his parents’ cramped, lower middle class apartment, a puppet theatre is also established as a second location. This forms the stage for scenes between mother and father to be reenacted by rabbit puppets; as a puppet, the son can also react in explosive fashion.

Genre

Documentary

Watch Online

Father's Garden: The Love of My Parents (2013) is currently not available on any services.

Cast

Director

Peter Liechti

Production Companies

Peter Liechti Filmproduktion GmbH

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Father's Garden: The Love of My Parents Videos and Images
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Father's Garden: The Love of My Parents Audience Reviews

Nonureva Really Surprised!
Onlinewsma Absolutely Brilliant!
Matrixiole Simple and well acted, it has tension enough to knot the stomach.
Brendon Jones It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.
JvH48 I saw this film at the Berlinale 2013. Upfront I have to reveal that it worked out much better than I derived from the synopsis on the festival website. It reflects on an elderly couple, being married for 62 years, carefully and compassionately interviewed by their son, all the time letting us wonder how these two got together in the first place. But that is precisely the beauty of what we hear from both sides.Please be prepared that the father says a lot of non-politically-correct things, like being the head of the family, hence that he makes the decisions (he talks about "convincing", but I rather think that the wife gives in after a while and let him have his way). Also, he was angry when his wife opened a private bank account for her part of the pension (I worked for that pension, and she did nothing). We hear much more such examples.The mother is honest in saying that the father was her first love. He had a steady job and was good looking when she married him. Nowadays she is very clear in stating that they are very very different, and illustrates this with ample examples. She wanted to go abroad and see the rest of the world, while he preferred to stay home during holidays. She was used to reading books, while he only read newspapers. She needed 15 minutes to iron each shirt (he was used to wearing shirts from his working days, and sees no reason to change when retired), while she rather had him wearing T-shirts instead. She had a fall twice around the bath, but he refused to install a grip because it would make holes and needed to be repaired that when leaving the house in a few years.All in all, many thanks for this intimate insight in the lives of a couple that was married for 62 years. The aforementioned examples to illustrate their differences make us wonder, however, whether this is not also an indictment against the concept of marriage "till dead us do part", to uphold the relationship against all logic when people find out they really don't match. This couple has obviously coped with their differences, regrettably by one of them always being the first to give in. I can imagine that this couple is far from unique, married in a time that a separation was not an option.