SunnyHello Nice effects though.

Odelecol Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

BelSports This is a coming of age storyline that you've seen in one form or another for decades. It takes a truly unique voice to make yet another one worth watching.

Roman Sampson One of the most extraordinary films you will see this year. Take that as you want.

atinder From Dusk till dawn 3.First watch, i love the first movie, i did not like the sequel too much at all but this movie is a Little bit of a mix bag,For the first hour of the movie, it felt like Western movie with no horror elements in the movie at all,I found the those scenes very dull and boring. I was really bored with most of the this movie and i all most turn it off after 45mins of the movie but stuck with it The movie did pick up in the last half hour of the movie.That when it went all horror and action really starts and don't stop until end of the movie, there were some decent gory effect in this movie, which i really liked.The make up effect were really good as well and made some of the vampires look scary and there were one or two funny moment in this movie that laugh at a little.I going to give this movie 5 out of 10

BA_Harrison The good news is that Scott Spiegel, who helmed the god-awful part 2, is no longer on directing duties, having been replaced by the far more capable P.J. Pesce; the bad news is that vampire fans might feel a tad cheated by this prequel, which takes a lot longer to get to the bloodsucking fun than either of its predecessors.For the majority of its running time, The Hangman's Daughter plays out much like a traditional western, following the exploits of several characters whose paths become inextricably intertwined: Johnny Madrid (Marco Leonardi) is a Mexican bandit who narrowly escapes the hangman's noose thanks to the help of young wannabe outlaw Reece (Jordana Spiro); Esmerelda (Ara Celi) is the hangman's daughter, who flees with Johnny, her father (Temuera Morrison) and his men in hot pursuit; Ambrose Bierce (Michael Parks) is an author searching for Pancho Villa with the intention of becoming a revolutionary; John and Mary Newlie (Lennie Loftin and Rebecca Gayheart) are bible-bashers hoping to spread God's word to the Wild West.After lots of fairly predictable western nonsense (shooting and spitting and cursing and drinking), spiced up with a little graphic gore (some splattery gun shots including a tasty hit to the head!), all of the characters converge on a remote desert inn where a gang of vampires prey on the clientèle. From here-on in, FDTD3 is a lot more fun, with plenty of welcome gore and gratuitous nudity (a forerunner of The Titty Twister, the inn is also a strip joint/knocking shop). The script leaves a few frustrating loose ends—most notably the significance of author Ambrose Bierce and his firing squad flashbacks—but when the vampire action kicks in, you probably won't care less. It's just a damn shame that they left it so late to get to the good stuff...

DigitalRevenantX7 The Story: Mexico, 1914. Johnny Madrid, an outlaw about to be hanged, escapes with the help of a stranger, taking with him the hangman's daughter. With the hangman after him, Madrid joins up with his saviour, a female outlaw wannabe who he later leaves to hang. All the characters, including Ambrose Bierce, a writer who is in Mexico to join Pancho Villa, meet up in a saloon in the middle of nowhere. Attacked by vampires, the group puts aside their differences in order to fight the vampires."Any last words?" This is the third film in the "From Dusk Till Dawn" trilogy. The original was a success although, from a story point of view, it disappointed. A combination of two films that did not fit together, the first half was a rather flat getaway flick with no wit, while the second half was nothing more than an extended barfight that tired quickly. The second film had a better plot but was killed off by poor writing & an overuse of real crappy camera angles."See you in hell?" While it cannot compare with the original in terms of makeup effects or kinetic action sequences, "The Hangman's Daughter" surpasses it in terms of story. The opening scene, with Madrid escaping the gallows, defending himself with knives hidden in the tips of his boots while his hands are tied behind his back, sets the pace pretty well. The characters are well drawn, particularly Michael Park's writer, a drunk atheist who in real life disappeared in Mexico in 1914. The fight scenes in the later stages are done better than the previous films, and are quite believable. The effects, while being slightly on the cheap side, still look good, save for one very silly (and funny) vampire testicle shot.

mario_c Not being as good as the original, this third chapter of From Dusk Till Dawn is a lot better than the second! Because of two main reasons: 1) It has a much better cinematography, as it's not a cheap B-series movie like the other one; 2) It follows an important premise of the original movie (which the second movie didn't do): a great part of the action is passed inside the vampires' bar. So, in spite of having the plot set on a different age (the XIX century) I think this film is a lot closer to the original than the second one. On the other hand it can be considered a prequel to the original film, especially to the bar and to SANTANICO PANDEMONIUM character.I enjoyed the plot, the characters, the soundtrack (excellent and powerful sounds during the fighting scenes inside the bar!!) and the acting. Nice film!