TrueHello
Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.
cynthia-fortier
The movie has some good points and redeeming qualities. I agree with the previous reviewer about Noam Chomsky's placement in the film. The story is from the view of the typified "music nerd" as stated in the film. I saw about 95-98% men in the film so it was very difficult to identify with. Come to think of it, I felt the same way when I tried to go into those stores when they were in their heyday - it seemed like many staff members acted like music snobs... So this made it a little more difficult to empathize. I would have been interested in seeing more female representation and their experience with the stores as well. Thurston Moore made some thoughtful points. Very one sided and made for a very slim target audience.
gavin6942
A documentary feature examining why over three thousand independent record stores have closed across the United States in the past decade...I enjoyed this documentary, as it presented some nice facts and statistics about record stores, album sales, album prices... the rise of MP3s, the Telecommunications Act, etc. And it let record store owners vent about the death of their industry.Unfortunately, I also found the documentary to be one-sided. While I would not say it was factually incorrect, it had an obvious bias. And that is unfortunate, because it makes the film political rather than strictly factual. I would have liked to hear more people on the other side defending themselves or the Telecommunications Act, even if I may not agree with their defense.Most unusual was the presence of Noam Chomsky. I love Chomsky, but he seemed very out of place here. He was able to offer some general comments about bigger businesses replacing smaller ones, but had nothing particular to say about record stores or the Telecommunicatons Act. He even told the interviewers he had not listened to music since the 1940s and that his grandchildren were more aware of what was going on.
rumour-has-it
First of all – just want to say – I'm a vinyl guy. And I'm not an older dude, I'm 28. I buy it at the local record store, and since most new music comes with download codes, I have it digitally too. Is there a lot of music I get online for free? Sure. But I buy a lot of the music I own, too, because I like having the records. Feels good in the hands. And I am a big supporter of the local record store – in Phoenix, where I live, there have been a few go under in the last few years, and there are really only a handful of good ones left.That said, I have a few problems with this film that really just have to do with its perspective of change in its industry. There's a certain nostalgia prevalent throughout the film that affects its many interviewees, and it tries to carry an argument which at its premise is a bit soft. One theme of the movie is that music – the culture, the art – and its fans are getting less by the changes in how music is discovered, bought, and talked about. But just as the movie geeks didn't die out with the bricks-and-mortar video rental industry, I really don't think music and all its subcultures have a whole lot to fear.The guys in the film may be glum that the emphasis is being shifted online, but that doesn't really signal a change in what music stands for or what we love about it. As long as bands make records, there will still be records to buy at record stores. And we'll still be having conversations about them in record stores, even though it's now happening more in other places – in blogs, bike shops, bars, basements, and plenty other places that start with "b." It's moving to places that start with other letters, too. Nothing's dying is what I'm saying, and I have a feeling that record stores going out of business haven't fully understood how they should integrate with the shift.I think that rarely is something ever lost when it comes to changes in art and culture; it's simply reinterpreted, redistributed, and enhanced in several cases. For example, the artwork on an LP is just that – artwork. In the past, yes, it was a significant companion to the album – but putting that one single element up on a pedestal is unnecessary today. Bands have websites, videos, posters, Twitter backgrounds, Facebook profiles, t-shirts/stickers/DVDs/etc. Less Than Jake made bobblehead dolls. Animal Collective even made a shoe. The bands are fine; music will live on. You can experience a particular group in more ways than ever before.If this film's argument is that music will somehow lose its way during the industry's transformation, then it seems they're simultaneously denying the resilience of the artists they claim to understand and champion. In the end, it really just does a good job of capturing the tail end of a cultural corollary and the wistful ruminations of those directly involved in its scene. A scene that yes, is shrinking, but is very much alive elsewhere.All that said, I'm still going to buy my music, and they'll still all be records. Feels good in the hands.Also: support your local record store!
Rob-O-Cop
there's definitely a story to be told in the every changing world of music delivery and why its changing. This doco touched on a number of key issues but lessened the impact by telling it in loaded language where it could have backed up what it was saying with facts and statistics. Instead we get a lot of conjecture and a picture that makes rock and roll look the un-coolest it ever has. Old men in sweaters talking about the evil empire and days gone by. Maybe that's the story the makers wanted to tell, but then there's the obvious affection for older mediums and the very valid argument of the erosion of community, so we really get mixed messages. This doco doesn't clear up any misconceptions or add much we didn't already know about the decline of the indie record store but at least it gets it all in one place for those new to the topic.
