BootDigest Such a frustrating disappointment

CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

Zandra The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

Logan By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.

LittleStorpingInTheSwuff By now anyone having watched the other movies in this series should realize it is merely fun entertainment and not meant to be a dramatic drams. It wasn't the best in the series, nor the worst. As far as taking the idea from "The Thomas Crown Affair" (I knew I had seen this plot somewhere but couldn't figure out where until I read a previous review) that was a trifle weak but still entertaining.One thing that has always puzzled me about 'speeding down hill with no breaks' scenes: why don't any of those drivers have sense enough to simply jam the gear shift into reverse or park? Sure, it will tear the crap out of the transmission, but it will keep the car from going out of control and over the cliff and/or a deadly head on crash, won't it? I can't say for sure about automatic transmission, but I do know that with a manual transmission you can down shift a gear at a time and use the engine as a break.

wildman1 The majority of this storyline has been copied from a MGM movie.Please watch the remake of The Thomas Crown affair to understand just how lazy the writers have been in copying elements then substituting in poor dialogue. Disgraceful that writers get away with this!For the record I do not watch the show but it was left on between channel flicking when I started to notice mild references which caught my attention. They even mention Piece Brosnan. Truly cringe worthy, please watch TTCA to fully appreciate my annoyance.

blanche-2 I had to chuckle at the previous review of this - obviously, the reviewer isn't familiar with this series and therefore can't possibly know that this is one of the better entries. Cathy Davis (Lea Thompson)(Jane Doe in her role as a CSA agent) is called by Darnell (Joe Penny) to help investigate the theft of a $150 million Vermeer painting at a Los Angeles museum, which previously belonged to a Jewish family and was taken by the Nazis. The daughter in the family, the only survivor and now quite elderly, has sold the painting to the museum. Discovering what happened to the original involves an insurance agent (Elaine Hendrix), an art collector (Phil Casnoff) and a waitress (Julianna McCarthy), a neo-Nazi (Mark Rolston) and a few others. The plot isn't bad, though elements of it can be figured out.The good thing about this episode is that there is very little of Cathy's banal family life - the fewer scenes at home, the better. If the series is to continue, let's hope that's a trend.

edwagreen Muddled story with stolen art, American Nazis, and an entire host of things included.Despite a stellar cast, the film suffers from constant confusion. Why was that art dealer killed? Would we actually think that an elderly Holocaust survivor was trying to fool people with the Veneer portrait? Do we have to be told that villain Philip Casnoff is thrown off the helicopter he flees to? Since when does a blonde dish have the name of Agnes? What an art investigator she is!Lea Thompson directed and starred in this mess as a housewife who goes on student field trips and also doubles as a secret agent. The mixing of the two is hard to believe as well as realize here. Thompson always has that bit of anger on her face when she is acting. I can't blame her here given the material that she has to work with.Joe Penny, as the cop Frank, is taken in by Agnes, Elaine Hendrix, and he looks entirely confused by all this.Nice seeing William R. Moses in the part of Thompson's husband. Remember him in Perry Mason? I always wondered what became of him. He is given so little to do in this film.