Kon-Tiki

2013
7.1| 1h58m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 26 April 2013 Released
Producted By: Nordisk Film Denmark
Country: United Kingdom
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://kontikifilmen.no/
Info

The true story about legendary explorer Thor Heyerdahl and his epic crossing of the Pacific on a balsa wood raft in 1947, in an effort to prove it was possible for South Americans to settle in Polynesia in pre-Columbian times.

Watch Online

Kon-Tiki (2013) is now streaming with subscription on Prime Video

Director

Joachim Rønning, Espen Sandberg

Production Companies

Nordisk Film Denmark

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial
Watch Now
Kon-Tiki Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Kon-Tiki Audience Reviews

Scanialara You won't be disappointed!
Solemplex To me, this movie is perfection.
ChanBot i must have seen a different film!!
ClassyWas Excellent, smart action film.
paulclaassen An instant favorite!! Incredible! Spectacular! Fascinating! Awesome! (there are a few more descriptive adjectives but lets stick to these). From the acting, to the visual effects, music and emotion, this was an incredible journey of pure delight. The excitement grips you from the beginning and never lets go. A satisfying adventure drama. Simply awesome!
OneEightNine Media Kon Tiki I love this movie. It is about a Swedish or Finnish or whatever explorer and his team who sails across the ocean on a raft to prove cross-continental colonization of a South American tribe took place in the orient. Funny how some of the best films are based on true stories. Anyway, the film is well acted, well told, well this and well that. Just go and check it out. Totally a ten out of ten kind of deal for sure. There is a reason why they picked this director to direct the latest POTC movie, which wasn't half bad by the way. In fact it was the second best Pirates movie made to date; not sure why the critics trashed it. Seriously, critics are killing Hollywood by calling trash treasure and treasure trash.
andriz First time I read the book of Thor Heyerdahl when I was 10. Have been reading it 10 times since then and for me Thor Heyerdahl is a true modern hero, much like James Corbett or some other few guys, who at one side are men of science, realistic planners, believers of knowledge and studying rather than emotional Indiana Jones's. At the other side they are people with great courage, true humanists and deeply in love with nature - as human is just a part of this organism we call "life in planer earth".Watching this movie was deep disappointment, especially knowing it was made in Norway.The book about expedition has several dimensions.First one is a planning phase. That's the most calculative part of the story and it has always wowed me, how much different planning there actually was. All the logistics - materials, people, building, money, supplies etc. Documents, approvals etc. The right crew - gotta make it work.Heyerdahl's expedition was ultimate masterpiece of planning & organizing in a very short time - they got the money, they got all the supplies. They got true balsa wood although they were repeatedly officially told to forget about it. They built this complex raft exactly like its ancestors were built 1000 years before, and they made almost nothing wrong. Its an ode to smart and patient men with hands of gold.The second dimension was the expedition itself - process of learning ocean, of learning to control the raft, of learning to navigate, of adapting to extreme living, of dealing with your fears being far from any land, of forming a well functioning team and building friendships. Process of everyone rising to their specialty in this new environment. Third one is being @ Raroia and Tahiti. It's a different one and is missing from this movie at all.Unfortunately - all this good stuff is gone from the movie, replaced by weird, overly simplified melodramatic approach. Why the cheap drama? To carry out a great idea, which is doable, but unspeakably difficult - it takes a lot of wisdom, most precise planning, cooperation. It takes learning, patience, lot of processes which are ultimately exciting to follow.Why throw all of it away and replace it with a hollow, fictional dramatic elements, that either never took place or had never any importance whatsoever?Whats really wowes you in the book - is their courage and confidence to themselves. In the movie there is like a bunch of scared schoolboys on a raft, when actually they were all very highly qualified scientists or specialists - handpicked by their personal qualities who made this story happen with their will.In addition - as this movie tries to tell the true Kon-Tiki story, it's really annoying there's so many details, which are simply wrong. Herman Watzinger wasn't simpleminded refrigerator salesman - he was cooling engineer in the middle of his doctoral studies - he took care of all the thermodynamic, meteorological and hydrographical measurements. Also a true leader, tough guy, strong as a bear (citing to Heyerdahl).Also - it wasn't Herman, who harpooned the whale shark - it was Erik Hesselberg. And he didn't do it out of fear rather than out of excitement. Also - the dance around the radio device is total bs - Thor was actually against of bringing the radio - ancient sailors didn't have any radios and also - he did not feel any appeal to the wires and electric switches whatsoever. Finally Watzinger convinced him its a good thing, they can help out meteorology stations in US etc. Also - sharks did not touch the parrot, it was just a big wave on a stormy day. Sharks prey bigger objects than the parrot. This was really stupid moment and the following was just as ridiculous - Knut didn't catch the shark to get revenge for eating a parrot :D They used to catch sharks with their bare hands all the time for sport - the descriptions about this "sport" are far more exciting in my mind. Also - Watzinger didn't splash in the ocean just wondering on the log. It was another occasion and he just went swimming. As it turned out, raft was moving so fast it simply drove away from Watzinger, although he was a great swimmer. Then they saw a shark approaching to Watzinger - and Haugland went in with the rope - barely saving Watzinger. Also - all these stupid confrontations between Thor and crew members, where Thor acts like sociopath leader - are total bs. This whole group dynamics is just simply wrong - there was no such things at Kon-Tiki. Although Thor was a captain - Hesselberg was only true sailor on board, who did all the navigation. And as they were all grown men, there was rather a cooperative spirit on board, they were about business. In real life - it did not center around Thor - everyone got their fare share of adventures. So they all were pretty famous to the end of their lives after the expedition. So all in all - avoid this movie, read the book! Then watch the documentary. And then watch documentary about Thor Heyerdahl's grandsons Olav's same expedition in 2012, on identical raft named Tangaroa.
The Couchpotatoes Movies based on a true story are always better, well at least most of the time they are. This story is quite incredible. I would never ever even consider to build a balsa raft and then cross the ocean from Peru to Polynesia. It must have taken a lot of courage and determination to begin an expedition like this one, certainly in that time. Now, about the movie itself, it is pleasant to watch, with nice shots even though they are most of the time on the ocean. The story is not boring at all, au contrary I thought it was very entertaining. No complaint about the cast either. All the actors were good and made it a very believable journey across the ocean. Good movie about a story I never heard of. Now I do, and I'm glad I do.