Scavengers

2013 "Survive the void."
2.8| 1h34m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 21 March 2013 Released
Producted By: California Pictures
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

A team of space scavengers discovers superior alien technology that threatens the balance of the known universe. Hotly pursued by a rival crew of intergalactic mercenaries, the Revelator crew must fight through the deepest reaches of space to locate and protect the life-altering device.

Watch Online

Scavengers (2013) is now streaming with subscription on Prime Video

Director

Travis Zariwny

Production Companies

California Pictures

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial
Watch Now
Scavengers Videos and Images
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Scavengers Audience Reviews

Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!
Dirtylogy It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.
Kien Navarro Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.
Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.
Terry King I've seen some stinkers in my time and I have no idea why I watched this, I think assuming it was a recent sci-fi film I couldn't go wrong. How wrong I was! It has the feel that someone made a bet they could make a film in a week with £100 budget and this was the result! All bad films I've seen generally have at least one thing I can say positive but unfortunately I'd struggle with this one. The script is incredibly dire and pointless, it would of made just as much sense as if I was watching a foreign film without subtitles. The acting is wooden but no doubt is due to the fact the script is so bad there wasn't any room to 'act'. Although it has to be said that Sean Patrick Flanery really deserves some kind of bad acting award as the choice of voice (a kind of Jack Bauer husky growl) and the constant wrinkled confused look on his face is annoying to the nth degree.The set design is non existent, more like someone went down the city dump and grabbed a load of old CRT and computer keyboards and stuck them everywhere. The lighting is simply too bright in most cases, if they were to simply turn most of the lights off they'd probably end up with something a lot more sinister and moodier. The CG looks like it was done on a home PC with free software. Some of the stills of the spaceships look okay but as soon as they move...oh dear. Also there is no ambient light in space, everything should be harsh shadows and yet against the pitch black of space the dark side of the spaceships are gray! Green-screen when the 'actors' are superimposed look awful, with blurry halos around everything. Sound was very lackluster, I don't recall anything adding to the ambiance or tension of the scenes.I didn't have the willpower to watch the whole film in one go but no film has ever beat me so I forced myself to finish it. The one redeeming thing about the film is I film privileged that I have now watched the worse film I've every seen. Thank you for that.
FChadc In a universe where everything is called a "protocol," can people who (apparently) can keep regenerating, no matter how often or messily they get killed, find any emotional meaning in anything? Nope.I have to admit, I was well into fast-forward mode by the time the first crew member regenerated, but at least it explained why his sweetheart didn't freak out when he exploded and covered her with blood and tissue. Instead, she stood there with a disgusted expression as if she'd just been in a foot fight, or someone dropped a paint-filled water balloon on her head. So I don't know what the whole regeneration sub-plot was about, but at the end there's all this emotional angst because the cute lady co-captain (I think) dies of a gunshot wound, and then in the last scene she's back as well, safe and sound (and even regenerated the same costume without bloodstains or bullet holes) so what's the big fuss? Did anyone watch this mess carefully enough to figure that out? I was mildly curious, but not enough to rewind it and watch a single extra frame again to find out.I wonder if they just put a bunch of actors together on the sets and had them make up their lines? So almost everything you have heard about how bad this movie is, is true. I don't think it's quite the worst science fiction movie I've ever seen. That would probably be Dracula 3000. This one actually seems to end the way someone intended it to end, stupid as that ending may be, instead of just stopping because they ran out of film or time or drugs or . . . something. But that said, this one is still right there nipping at Dracula 3000's heels.
lightningslim Make a note everybody, a 1* review on IMDb = "Awful." For this movie a new level of stars is required, I suggest - 1 minus star for every bad thing about the movie... -* Script -Unintelligible, yet trying so hard to be profound, at least that is my guess at what this mess is trying to be. -* Acting - Hard to tell if there was any really except for the "Star" who was giving a tour de force display of "Overacting, and how to look really really stupid, while sounding really really intoxicated." -* Directing - Well, I suppose someone was telling them what to do, but it's very hard to be sure on the evidence presented. -* Visual effects - Yes there were some, but none worthy of positive mention -* Sound effects - Someone mentioned already "Machine guns in space!" But let me also mention hearing far off explosions in a vacuum!-* Physics - I suppose with all the other drivel, I shouldn't expect much, but spaceships exhibiting ballistic motion? Yes, a lot of other "Sci-fi" movies don't get it right either, but that's no excuse! I'm sure the was more to moan about, but frankly I could only stomach 29.03 minutes of this junk. Also minus 6 stars is enough to get the message across.PS. Any positive reviews must be by those who were involved in this monster of a movie, or possibly those on strong medication... Hmm probably both!
nwsts I give 1's to very few films...maybe a total of 3 out of a couple of thousand films watched. This movie is well deserving of a 1 and possibly worse. I'm not sure what I could subtract from the already appalling reviews that have accurately described this movie. But let me also warn you that the actors slurred their words (especially the chief villain) and the audio engineering was also horrible. Be forewarned that the sets, costumes, cinematography and special effects were all equally horrible. Finally, let me say the sequencing of the plot (storytelling) was well below amateurish. I watched diligently the first half of the movie (about 45 minutes) and then started fast forwarding through sections, hoping something worthwhile would present itself....to no avail. To the reviewer here who watched it twice looking for something good, you have my respect as a true devotee...and my condolences.