Robert Joyner
The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one
Portia Hilton
Blistering performances.
Zlatica
One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.
crunchycloset
This is a terrible movie, the history don't surprise, the cast of actors are the worst and the lighting is a shame!
kmarialm
It was slow, anticlimactic, and poorly executed. Bad acting. Poor camera crew. It was like a cheap made at home $100 movie. Would not recommend
keylamichelle
STThis is probably one of the worst movies ever made. The acting was horrible. The lighting and sound was awful. I really wish I could get my money back. It was poorly made and cheesy. I don't even want to waste anymore time on this movie and keep writing. Save yourselves this movie stunk so bad it made me mad.
Laiath
If you can get over the horrible lighting, the God awful camera-work (think shaky and out of focus quite a few times), and Tommy Dreamer's annoyingly bad acting, it's actually a pretty good movie. I'd never watched anything with Rachel Jane Conn in it before, but turns out she's one hell of an actor. She could teach some of the so called A- listers a few lessons in how to scream like you're in actual pain, or conveying a plethora of emotions with your facial expressions alone (looking at you, Kristen Stewart). James Duval was also great, but can't really comment on his acting without giving spoilers. I really liked the premise and the script as well, and the twist, and even the ending. Those are really rare in B (or C, in this case?) movies. Go ahead and give it a shot; you might like it too.
