The Four Feathers

1929 "Paramount's new sensation!"
7| 1h21m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 01 June 1929 Released
Producted By: Paramount
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

An Englishman (Richard Arlen) fights in the Sudan after receiving white feathers of cowardice from his fiancee (Fay Wray) and friends.

Genre

Adventure, Drama

Watch Online

The Four Feathers (1929) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Lothar Mendes, Merian C. Cooper, Ernest B. Schoedsack

Production Companies

Paramount

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
The Four Feathers Videos and Images
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

The Four Feathers Audience Reviews

ThiefHott Too much of everything
Evengyny Thanks for the memories!
Abbigail Bush what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.
Zandra The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.
bsmith5552 "The Four Feathers" is the oft filmed story of bravery and cowardice set in the 1860s in England and the Sudan in Africa. This version is significant as Paramount's last silent movie although it does have a synchronized music score together with sound effects.Four aspiring young officers, Harry Faversham (Richard Arlen), William Trench (William Powell), Jack Durrance (Clive Brook) and Castleton (Theodore Van Eltz) dream of glory on the battlefield for Queen and country. Faversham has doubts about whether or not he can live up to the family history of great soldiers. He is also about to marry Ethne Eustace (Fay Wray), the daughter of a Colonel.One evening, a message is delivered to Harry warning of an upcoming war. He tries to hide the message from the others but Trench accidentally finds it. Meanwhile fearing the upcoming war, Harry resigns his commission. The three friends brand Harry as a coward and each present him with a white feather signifying cowardice. Ethne, coming from a military background, also brands him a coward and presents him with a feather of her own.....hence the four feathers of the title.The last straw for Harry is when he visits his dying father General Faversham (George Fawcett) who has learned of Harry's actions. The old man dies believing his son to be a coward. Harry angered, vows to return each of the four feathers to their presenter.In disgrace, Harry flees to the Sudan where the aforementioned war is being waged. He wanders aimlessly about until he hears of a battle where Trench has been captured. Harry with the help of a young boy, Ali (Harold Hightower) and his monkey, sneaks into the prison where Trench is being held but is captured in the attempt.Later, the prisoners are brought to a slave market where the slave trader (Noah Beery) negotiates for the two white men (Harry and Trench). Harry with the help of Ali manages to free himself. The slave trader catches them and slays the young boy before being over powered by Harry. Harry and Trench escape and Harry returns Trench's feather to him.Harry learns of Durrance's valiant attempt to defend his isolated fort against hordes of attackers while wounded. He then slips through enemy lines in an effort to reach the fort and.............................Long time Paramount star Richard Arlen makes a dashing hero although it is a mystery to me as to how he manages to sneak into the prison and the fort respectively. A lot of people don't realize that William Powell had a productive career in silent before his Thin Man days. He turns in an excellent performance here as the second lead. Fay Wray has little to do as the love interest. Noah Beery, nasty as ever, gets the hisses for his slaying of the young boy.Is it me or does this film invoke memories of "Beau Geste" (1926)? Both have a prologue featuring the main characters as children, both feature the hero fleeing in disgrace, both have an isolated fort and both have large numbers of enemies attacking said forts from a desert. Just asking.
GManfred I liked this version better than the 1939 British version but it is still very hard to swallow. The novel is famous and so are the film versions, but I thought that "The Four Feathers" is the height of escapist entertainment. Not for a minute did I buy the premise of a dishonored soldier redeeming himself by such preposterous acts of heroism and gallantry. In any case, this one is more exciting and absorbing than the later version in that the battle scenes and location shots were staged better, and the actors were more suited to their roles. I especially mean casting Richard Arlen as Harry Faversham. He was better by far than John Clements, who even at the end of the film still seemed like a weakling, whereas Arlen never did. He seemed more conflicted than cowardly. This '29 version has affirmed my belief that remakes are inferior to originals - even if this was twice filmed previously.
bkoganbing The popular A.E.W. Mason novel, the British version of The Red Badge Of Courage, got its third screen version from Paramount in 1929. Technology was winning a race with Paramount that year. Had The Four Feathers been done a bit later it would have included sound and we would have heard such folks in the cast as Richard Arlen, William Powell, Clive Brook, and Fay Wray make their talkie debuts. Sound Effects were added on however post production.Richard Arlen is our protagonist Harry Fevasham in this version. He's been brought up in a military family and it and England expects every Fevasham to do his duty. But Harry even as a juvenile questions whether he has the right stuff. When his regiment is called to the Sudan he resigns his commission. Four of his fellow officers send him the anonymous white feather and brand him a coward. His fiancé turns from him, his family disowns him.What to do but go to the Sudan and in your own way fight for the British Empire. Fevasham's adventures, incognito at first, make up the rest of the novel and this film.This version can hardly be compared to the one that Alexander Korda made for the British cinema in 1939. It has the one unforgettable advantage of being filmed in the Sudan at the actual battle sites at Khartoum and Omdurman. This one has some nice location shooting in California's Imperial Valley and earnest performances from the cast.Good thing this one was preserved. See how it stacks up against the many others filmed.
fallingwater32 I am a HUGE Richard Arlen fan, so of course, did I ever love this one!!!! The filming is rather modern for that era and the emotion and action seem to be equally portrayed and well done by all. There doesn't seem to be the same kind of poetry and grand cinema "feel" in later movies, I am glad it was produced in this decade of film-making. I love Fay Wray, she is well-paired with Arlen. This story is one of personal discovery and courage despite great adversity and seemingly impossible odds. Richard Arlen comes to sound without one iota of hesitation* and does one of tha most memorable characters in his long career. Friendship, betrayal, redemption: Great stuff to put on the screen--fantastic story. *(This is one of the first pictures made after sound was available.) Exceptional Group of Classic Film Stars!! Hope I can find a copy for my Richard Arlen video collection.