Truth in Numbers? Everything, According to Wikipedia

2010 "Imagine a world where everyone had access to the sum of all human knowledge"
6.8| 1h25m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 01 July 2010 Released
Producted By:
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://www.truthinnumbersthemovie.com/
Info

Although Wikipedia is the 8th most popular website on the Internet today, and it is already the 3rd most widely read 'publication' in human history, attracting 100 million unique visitors a month, this great social and academic experiment of our age is riddled with vandals and challenged by skeptics, posing compelling questions about whether Wikipedia's model can truly achieve its goal. The film intersperses founder Jimmy Wales' unusual rise to Internet super-stardom among the global implications of Wikipedia. Are entries factually accurate? Biased? Accountable? Does 'Jimbo' Wales posses the wisdom to ensure that Wikipedians aggregate knowledge correctly?

Genre

Documentary

Watch Online

Truth in Numbers? Everything, According to Wikipedia (2010) is currently not available on any services.

Cast

Director

Nic Hill, Scott Glosserman

Production Companies

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Truth in Numbers? Everything, According to Wikipedia Videos and Images
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Truth in Numbers? Everything, According to Wikipedia Audience Reviews

Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much
Solemplex To me, this movie is perfection.
Actuakers One of my all time favorites.
Kaelan Mccaffrey Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.
Gommukker This film provides a clear picture of the motives that drive Wales' vision, and provide a well-needed platform for critical discussion of Wikipedia, with plenty of screen time given to advocates and dissenters of the project. It's entertaining and informative, and a good primer for the newbie as to how Wikipedia works, and highlights some of the flaws if addressed, could improve both the project and public perception of it, particularly academic and scholarly perception of it.