Cleveronix
A different way of telling a story
ChicRawIdol
A brilliant film that helped define a genre
Odelecol
Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.
Guillelmina
The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.
lyndalu-45740
I was going to say this was the most ridiculous documentary I've ever seen but you can't call this show a documentary, its more like a comedy based on the most ridiculous assumptions. If you're looking for a good laugh, this is your show, if you are looking for unbiased truths, you won't find them here.
ejones-77840
To Tcart...Watch the Video of Pres. Kennedy's car coming onto Elm St..just as it passes in front of the book depository , slow it down and you will see Oswald standing in the doorway next to a Black woman...while the rifle is seen sticking out the window.n Impossible to be in 2 places at once...THERE GOES YOUR OSWALD THEORY ! HE WAS A PATSY ! The KILL shot came from the front as the reaction of Kennedy's body shows.A body goes back when shot from the front !
Hingle McCringleberry
I don't know what to say. This 'documentary' is an absolute train wreck. I have seen cable access shows that were better produced and made more valid arguments. This 'documentary' proves the axiom that ANYONE can make a movie... Now, I won't spend a lot of time breaking down the hundreds of logical errors and giant holes in the logic presented in this film. There are two reasons for this. First, there are simply too many to address. Second, the 'logic' behind those errors is so discombobulated that I would first have to explain their twisted reasoning, then point out the flaws. It would simply take too long.I don't think this is really a spoiler but in a nutshell, this movie tries to tie the assassination of President John F. Kennedy to George Bush by tracing contacts all the way back to Adolph Hitler... Do I need to go any further??? The problem with every single point in this film is that IT PROVES NOTHING other than the fact certain people high in government positions might know one another... Even that is a stretch in some cases. George Bush was head of the CIA, OF COURSE HE NEW ALLEN DULLES... I mean, really???? How could he NOT know Allen Dulles????It is just silly beyond belief. The entire premise is that simply because people knew each other, they assassinated the president. It is the work of a person with POOR CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS made for people with the same condition.Here is a short breakdown of who will like this movie. If you have any of the traits or conditions below, this movie is for you:1. You hate the Bush family and are willing to believe that every single thing that happens on the planet is their doing.2. You have poor critical thinking skills and tend to find correlation between people and events that don't exist because of your preconceived notions and thinking errors.3. You believe literally ANY conspiracy theory, no matter how false or dense.4. You have an associates degree in Sociology from any Community College in the United States.5. You are a heroin/meth/coke addict.6. You have suffered severe trauma to the head.7. You are mentally retarded.8. You smoke copious amounts of marijuana.Otherwise stay away from this cinematic turd......
#1 Movie Lover
'Dark Legacy' is a film that everyone interested in the Kennedy assassination and its circumstances should watch. It's on Netflix instant streaming, which greatly increases its accessibility.First of all, the film presented tons of pieces of evidence that prove JFK was probably murdered as the result of a conspiracy. It proves why the single-bullet theory is absolutely ridiculous. It uses government memos to prove the points it makes. Basically, it has more detail and convincing arguments than other works that try to do the same thing. The person who made the film claims that it proves the conspiracy's existence beyond a reasonable doubt. Maybe so.Unfortunately though, even the most casual of viewers could tell that this is a low-budget film. There's nothing wrong with low-budget films, but this one had a couple of spelling mistakes (i.e. "Napoleon" being spelled "Napolean," and lack of punctuation in a crucial sentence (i.e. at one point it says, "Hoover knew that the Bushs were Nazis"). This is not good for a documentary, because it lowers the credibility.Also, I couldn't help but notice that some of the facts presented were biased after doing some research. #1: Allen Dulles actually was not a Nazi sympathizer. #2: Saying that Bay of Pigs was done without any of JFK's approval or foreknowledge is kind of misleading. #3: JFK's head moves forward a little before going back and to the left.Parts of this film are eye-opening, and much of it is good film-making. However, it's obviously low-budget and some of it is kind of biased. I guess I'd say the good kind of outweighs the bad.
