Family Troubles

1943
5.1| 0h10m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 03 April 1943 Released
Producted By: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Our Gang member Janet Burston believes that her family is neglecting her, so she decides to run away from home. The other gang members try to help Janet get adopted (or "adapted") by a more agreeable family, choosing a kindly elderly couple (Sarah Padden and Harry C. Bradley) for the honor.

Genre

Comedy, Family

Watch Online

Family Troubles (1943) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Herbert Glazer

Production Companies

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Family Troubles Videos and Images

Family Troubles Audience Reviews

Ensofter Overrated and overhyped
Humaira Grant It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.
Quiet Muffin This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.
Geraldine The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.
tavm This M-G-M comedy short, Family Troubles, is the two hundred thirteenth entry in the "Our Gang" series and the one hundred twenty-fifth talkie. Janet's been crying outside because of her family's neglecting her while her aunt visits, preferring to concentrate on her older sister. So the gang has her getting adopted by a kindly elderly couple. Except that couple know about Janet and decide to teach her a lesson by being mean to her when no one's looking. Well, this was the most contrived, not to mention the worst acted, "comedy" in the series yet. It's so bad that when there's an attempted laugh involving Froggy saying "All's well that ends well, I always say" and Janet's father says "Shakespere said that" and Froggy just says "Shucks!", I just shook my head and wished that Pete the Pup just showed up and did what he did at the end of that other awful OG short, Big Ears: Flew his ears up and made a raspberry with them! What's next...
dbborroughs Janet feels unloved by her family and decides to run away. She meets up with the gang who try to find her new parents to "adapt" her. the couple they choose decide that they will teach her a lesson by making her miserable but this only results in her and the gang running away again...Are we having fun or what? I know comedy is a step away from tragedy but this is ridiculous.Give them points for trying something different, but take a few away for not really hitting the mark. The odd mix of tones results in a film that is neither funny nor sad, its just kind of a messy pot boiler. Its different I'll give it that but its not really worth seeing.
jbacks3 You've got to hand it to Our Gang. It began way back sometime in the late summer of 1922 and was carefully nurtured by Hal Roach and, in the best entries, his ace-kid's director Bob McGowan. Somewhere in the mid-30's Roach said he saw the writing on the wall for shorts (prematurely, in my opinion) and sold off the Our Gang series to his distributor, MGM. Trouble was, the mega-studio had no clue on how to handle comedy or the inclination to give the series the special attention it needed to thrive. All MGM could successfully do with it toward the end was shove the increasingly--- often painfully--- unfunny horts down the throats of their parent Loew's theater chain. Family Troubles is just about as bad as Our Gang could get with it's anemic 'the grass isn't always greener' plot. It's one of MGM's attempts at teaching a lesson--- a plot device avoided like the plague by Roach & Co. It ranks with Robot Wrecks as the bottom of the Our Gang barrel. Unfortunately, there would be 8 more shorts to follow before the series was quietly killed off. (No stars!)
marjcbs I propose that the writers of "Family Troubles" held the following brainstorming session regarding the so-called comic potential for the story ---Writer #1: "Tell me what you guys think of this: we start off the film with Janet drowning in tears because she feels her family doesn't love her anymore."Other writers: "HEY, THAT'S FUNNY! HO HO HO HA HA HA! WHAT A BEGINNING!"Writer #2: "OK, if you think THAT'S funny, how's this: the Gang tries to to get an elderly couple to adopt Janet, and this couple tries to teach Janet a lesson by making her life twice as miserable!"Other Writers: "HEE HEE HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HAW! WHERE DO YOU GUYS COME UP WITH THIS? WHAT A RIOT!"Writer #3: "Oh, this will be surpass even that -- at the end of the movie, Froggy happily says: 'All's well that ends well, I always say.' Then Janet's father corrects him: 'Froggy, Shakespeare said that.' 'He did?? Shucks!' yells Froggy.Other writers: "OH, MY STOMACH! WOO HOO HAA HAA WAA HAA HAA! WE SHOULD ALL GET A RAISE, WE'RE SO DARNED FUNNY!"And that, my friends, is how "funny" this movie is.