Erica Derrick
By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.
Roxie
The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;
Logan
By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.
swjg
Director Brian Oakes explores the life and death of his childhood friend - independent journalist James Foley - beheaded by ISIS in 2014.I saw it at an open air showing in Newport, RI where a co-writer was there for the talkback.-- You may remember the ISIS video beheading James Foley which caused such a stir in 2014. So the documentary explores his childhood, jobs that lead him to becoming an independent photojournalist and family reaction to his kidnapping and death. James is also portrayed through the testimony of his fellow captors who were freed.-- HOWEVER with no disrespect intended to those who made the documentary and to James' family who suffered the loss......The film is flawed for its omissions. James Foley lost his accreditation with the US Army as an embedded journalist for less than stellar behavior while working with them. It also states that the US government did nothing to secure his release while other governments worked to secure the release of their journalists.The documentary omits to point out the clear difference between those journalists whose governments were not bombing Syria and the USA which was and which put it in no negotiating position. Shockingly while repeatedly stating the US Government did NOTHING - the film omits completely a Delta Force raid that took place a month before his death to free him and other journalists. The raid failed not through poor execution - the Delta force came out of the raid unscathed - but because after months of tracking his whereabouts from one jail to the next - the raid went in and just missed him as he was moved yet again to another place of captivity.These omissions of clear fact - badly weaken some of the documentary's other assertions which one can't help question as a result.The interviews with other captives who were imprisoned with James are overly long. Well intended though they are - more should have ended up on the cutting room floor to tighten up the story.Though it is briefly mentioned that large press agencies have slashed budgets and that many independent photo journalists work on shoe string budgets the full implications of this are not explored. James comes across as naïve at best with no training as to how to act in a war zone. Accidental engagement and death of a fellow journalist in the front line is treated as sad but an exhilarating adventure. And though he personally chose to wear a helmet and small vest - it was nothing to that which news organizations like the BBC make their journalists wear after extensive training.Perhaps the best 30 seconds of the whole affair is an almost throw away remark by a fellow journalist: "ISIS is at war with journalists because we tell the truth and expose their regime for what it really is" If the film had concentrated on that statement and the lousy budgets of news organizations who no longer have foreign bureau to tell stories well - leading to well intended but untrained journalists in the field - it would have made a better film.This is an emotive subject so YMMV.
clarkj-565-161336
I saw this at a sell out crowd at Hot Docs Toronto last night. All I can say is that there wasn't a dry eye anywhere next to me. What I thought was really moving was what the director said. He wanted the world to see his friend Jim Foley as he really was, not by the various stories and false accounts that were circulating. What comes across loud and clear is that everyone that encountered Jim was impressed by his ability to connect with people no matter what their circumstances and also his lack of guile or ulterior motive. If ever there was the right person at the right time he was it. Although our world is totally connected, there is a huge lack of timely and correct information. We desperately need the Jim Foleys of this world.
poe-48833
James Foley was one of those crazy-brave journalists who are the very backbone of any legitimate 21st century Democracy- someone who quite literally put it all on the line to tell us all just what the f--- was REALLY going on around the world. DEMOCRACY NOW! was where I first saw Foley, and I was impressed from the first; like Amy Goodman and everyone else I've discovered on DEMOCRACY NOW!, Foley risked his life to get to the Truth and to present it to the world. His final moments are hard to watch (and here I'm talking about what we see in JIM: THE JAMES FOLEY STORY; I have no morbid interest whatsoever in seeing the rest). This documentary is as much a tribute to the Spirit of True Journalism as it is to the man who inspired it.
Jordan Satmary
The emotional depth of this documentary is vast, impressive, immersive. In "Jim", James Foley is beautifully dissected as one of the most honest and kind-hearted conflict journalists of any time. I find it hard to review this film because of how powerful the entire experience was. I teared up half a dozen times, I couldn't find many words to say to my friends afterwards and neither could they. The documentary seemed to have taken control of us. But the moment that topped off the experience was after the Sundance screening, the director, James Foley's parents, and the young French journalist that was in captivity with James came out for a Q&A. The entire 500 seat audience gave a standing ovation, many in tears.I'm not sure how else to explain it without giving anything away. It was hard to stomach some of the more graphic and real images from inside Syria. Overall it was an incredible viewing experience, one that needs to be shared with as many people as possible. Especially in 2016 when ISIS appears to be a real threat.
