Clevercell Very disappointing...

AniInterview Sorry, this movie sucks

Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated

Stevecorp Don't listen to the negative reviews

jm10701 Persécution is a hard movie to describe accurately. It's the story of Daniel (Romain Duris), a loft renovator in Paris. Daniel is inordinately important to the people in his life, whom he mostly treats with what seems like hostility.He has an unstable relationship with his very independent girlfriend Sonia (Charlotte Gainsbourg). A stranger (Jean-Hugues Anglade) begins to stalk him, although in extraordinarily creative ways and without any threat or malicious intent. But the details of the plot really don't matter much. It's not really a story; it's an experience.This (like every earlier Patrice Chéreau movie I've seen - which are only L'homme blessé (which starred Jean-Hugues Anglade in his luminous youth), Those Who Love Me Can Take the Train, and Son frère, but they're three of the most memorable movies I've ever seen) deeply challenges its audience in ways other directors' movies never do.It's impossible to watch a Chéreau movie without a completely open mind, free of every normal expectation: that you will understand it, that you will be able to empathize with ANY of the characters, that you will even know whether you like it or not.Chéreau, either intentionally or unintentionally, ALWAYS made movies that force the viewer to surrender control, to step outside everything familiar, to go wherever he leads without questioning where or why. Watching a Chéreau movie is more life-changing, more consciousness-expanding, more iconoclastic than entertaining.I LOVE that kind of challenge, I LOVE that kind of movie, and only Chéreau ever demanded so much from an audience. If you don't WANT to be challenged like that, if you don't WANT your mind and your world shaken to their foundations and rebuilt by someone else, then don't bother watching this amazing movie. You'll hate it.

azneel128 I was personally struck by this movie because I left the theaters wondering about the similarities between this movie and my life. Then I discovered that this movie must be about someone with paranoid schizophrenia. I had a brain injury and have developed some interesting delusions. The clues are all there: as those with e-r-o-t-o-mania imagine, there is somebody that stalks him and a "celebrity" that doesn't have time to interact much (i.e., nonexistent. The plot is about a man coming to terms with his personal conflicts and what they mean to him. There is a deeper meaning to the scenes of silent observation.

jotix100 Patrice Chereau's latest film touches a lot of themes that evidently are dear to him. At the center of the story is Daniel, a man that is a a living contradiction, and who remains an enigma after all is said and done, because the viewer never finds a common trait of his in which to empathize with this strange man, even though he is the whole film.As the action begins, we get a glimpse of Daniel sitting in a crowded metro as a ragged panhandler goes through the car asking for money. No one seems to be moved by the woman's plight, much less give her a coin to get rid of her. As the beggar stands next to a young woman that looks up to the intruder with a smile, she responds with a slap on both her cheeks, something that leaves the people around them stunned. Daniel decides to find out what triggered the panhandler's reaction, but the young woman is not about to tell him anything.Daniel is a sort of remodeling contractor in to be a long distance relationship with Sonia, a thirtysomething woman that seems to talk to him more on the phone than in real time. When they see each other at a pub, they hardly show any tenderness for one another. To aggravate things, Daniel is surprised by a stalker that makes his way into the apartment he is working. Finding this intruder naked in bed, Daniel becomes furious when the man declares to be in love with him.Part of Daniel's problems might be related to his own family life. His father, now dead, had retired to a nursing home where he ended his days. Daniel decides to volunteer at one institution where we watch him tending to the needs of two of the residents, a painter and an old woman. Daniel surprises in the way he can be kind one moment and be dismissive of a friend, whom he disses at the pub to a crowd of friends. At the same time, Daniel is seen to go help the motorcyclist who suffers an accident right in front of his eyes, when no one intervenes.Patrice Chereau and Anne Marie Trividic's screenplay for this film wants to explore Daniel's soul and what makes him the contradiction he appears to be while searching for meaning in his own life. It is not an easy film to sit through, but it shows flashes of intelligence in the way one is never able to figure out people that have touched us. Mr. Chereau succeeds is in creating a complex character of Daniel, brilliantly acted by one of France's leading actors, Romain Duris.Whatever one's perception of the film, the acting of Mr. Duris alone is worth a look at this enigmatic man full of contradictions. Charlotte Gainsbourg appears as Sonia in a role that needed someone like her in order to make the character work. Ms. Gainbourg is an intelligent performer who gives a nuanced reading of Sonia, Daniel's girlfriend. Jean-Huges Anglade's stalker is perhaps one of the strangest addition to the picture. His motivations in zeroing on Daniel never comes to a head because Daniel shows repulsion to his advances. Others in the film in supporting roles, the great Tsilla Chelton, who plays one of the people in the senior residence, Gilles Cohen, and Michel Duchaussoy, as the painter in the nursing home.The film has a dizzying rhythm helped by the camera work by Yves Cape that captures a Paris we do not see often in movies. Eric Neveux contributed to the film score. Like him, or not, Mr. Chereau remains a voice to be reckoned with in the French cinema.

patemdens This a puzzling piece of film making by a respected french film/theatre director. Patrice Chereau occasionally strikes a perfect balance in between story telling and cinematic language : Queen Margot, those who love me can take the train and l'homme blesse. Yet here, there is a conflict of interest that makes uncomfortable viewing. In my opinion, this is the kind of film that only actors can appreciate. Patrice Chereau tackles what I think is his recurring theme in this : damaged rejection and it's not done very well. Despite top class acting by the 3 main leads, we are expected to care for the character played by Romain Duris who is right down detestable and isn't able to decide how he loves Charlotte Gainsbourg. (her voice and vulnerability is really something here) The 2 actors are clearly comfortable being filmed arguing and or making love in a very crude manner. The lighting of the sex scenes (and in fact the whole film) made me feel like I was peeping on them. Then, appears with very little explanation, the character played by Jean Hugue Anglade. His character is referred to as "le barjo -french slang for nutter-". He is in love with Romain Duris and will go to any length to make his feelings known.Great idea for a synopsis and what really made me want to watch this film, but not well executed. Now i am not suggesting by any means that the treatment would have been more convincing if given the Hollywood make over IE cheap effective thriller a la "fatal attraction" but I felt cheated as I was never given a chance to appreciate a great idea. Why is J Hugue Anglade in love with Romain Duris is well, anyone's guess. He is suppose represent the persecution and a threat but I really liked him in fact, he can come and wait naked for me here anytime! I think Patrice Cherau was trying to trick the viewer and at the end, the persecution comes from Romain Duris's character himself. It didn't work, even the scenes during which Romainn Duris redeems his unhappiness by caring for elderly people in a hospital are boring. the film feels disjointed and I had the impression that Patrice Chereau had a few well worded one liners about human relationships in mind and desperately tried to put them in some scenes, especially when Romain Duris and Charlotte Gainsbourg argue, which they do a lot. I could not stop thinking of the 3 actors and Patrice Chereau having a conversation on set about trust, real acting and how great is it for the 4 of them to tackle such risky film-making. Yet I felt strangely left out, uninvolved... Shame as I so wanted to see this...i was just kept out.