Signpost to Murder

1964 "Are we all potential killers?"
6.2| 1h14m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 19 May 1965 Released
Producted By: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

An escaped mental patient, reported to be homicidal, hides out in a woman's rural home.

Genre

Thriller, Crime

Watch Online

Signpost to Murder (1964) is currently not available on any services.

Director

George Englund

Production Companies

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Signpost to Murder Videos and Images
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Signpost to Murder Audience Reviews

SpuffyWeb Sadly Over-hyped
CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.
Bumpy Chip It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.
Freeman This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.
I-Am-The-Movie-Addict Signpost to Murder (1964) shows how far a story can go and give other minds and viewers a range of perspective of what an accused can be and what an accusation lead to. Starting with the suit-the- bill performance of the Joanne Woodward as Molly Thomas, Stuart Whitman as Alex Forrester & Edward Mulhare as Dr. Mark Fleming, I each has done their needed so nothing there. Now coming to the plot and the execution, I believe such a story needs more maze runs than simple yet obscure endings to be intriguing and adrenaline because of the genre it falls under. The story of the film comes from the play by Monte Doyle of same name, which tells the tale of (Stuart) A man on a run from law after escaping a criminal asylum finds refuge, love, connection and betrayal in the house of a woman (Molly) who has her own ulterior plans to execute.And, how a night of run and chase and lies and personas come out revealing.At last, this is a brief review, i had the chance of watching this film and as usual, being a suspense and murder mystery kind of cult thriller, let it keep it this way.Also, later, this film and the source play, got another adaptation in the forms of-1) A Gujarati play titled Dhummas2) Ittefaq(coincidence) (1969) directed by Yash Chopra starring Rajesh Khanna3) Ittefaq(coincidence) (2017) directed by Abhay Chopra starring Akshaye Khanna & Sidharth MalhotraIf you want to watch this film, then you can check YT and links below,https://youtu.be/I0Yyda3Dg1Q
blanche-2 Joanne Woodward, Stuart Whitman, and Edward Mulhare star in "Signpost to Murder," a 1964 film directed by George Englund. This almost seemed to me to be a television production, as the scenes seemed to be set up for commercials.Whitman plays a convicted murderer, in prison for ten years. He has been working with a psychiatrist (Mulhare). He escapes when the board refuses his release and hides out in a house owned by Woodward and her husband. Woodward's husband is expected home; in the meantime, prison officials and police are combing the area for the convict.Very good story, fabulous set, somewhat slow-moving in the British fashion (since it is British) but with an exciting ending. The excellent Woodward is quite glamorous here, and Whitman does a terrific job. Whitman was one of those actors who, had he come along ten years earlier, would have been part of a studio build-up and had a much better career in films. Like many of his contemporaries, he wound up doing a lot of television.Recommended if you're a mystery/suspense lover.
bkoganbing I saw a Law And Order episode that had a similar theme to Signpost For Murder in which a psychiatrist played by Robert Foxworth was able to manipulate his patient in the way Edward Mulhare was doing with Stuart Whitman in this film. The Law And Order episode was infinitely superior.I think Paul Newman was shooting Lady L in Europe at the time and Joanne Woodward got this film to do probably to keep herself busy. She plays the owner of a house where escaping mental patient Stuart Whitman takes refuge. Later on her husband turns up very dead, first for Whitman privately and then very publicly. And who's going to believe Whitman who is in the insane asylum for strangling his wife.Mulhare, Whitman, and Woodward have all seen better films than this one. Definitely subpar for all of them although being the professionals they are they give the film there all. It just ain't enough.
pgilvoz I also give this b/w thriller high marks. The story is good and as mentioned in another comment, the set is terrific and the atmosphere of suspense and intrigue sustains your interest. You begin to suspect that something's not quite right, but you're still surprised when it is revealed. One of my favorite actors, whom I had the pleasure of knowing briefly, was Edward Mulhare, and this is one of the few chances he was given in this country to show his appeal. Whitman reaffirms that he was a very underrated actor, despite his Oscar Nomination for "The Mark", having ultimately been relegated to B-Westerns and some unexceptional, though frequent, TV guest appearances. All in all, a very well-spent 74 minutes or so.