Star Quest: The Odyssey

2009
1.6| 1h22m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 03 November 2009 Released
Producted By:
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

At the end of mankind's greatest battle, empires will crumble, alliances will form, enemies will rise and heroes will fall. World's will end, and a new journey will begin.

Watch Online

Star Quest: The Odyssey (2009) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Jon Bonnell

Production Companies

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Star Quest: The Odyssey Videos and Images

Star Quest: The Odyssey Audience Reviews

SoTrumpBelieve Must See Movie...
Dotsthavesp I wanted to but couldn't!
Dynamixor The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.
Logan By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.
Wilmer Stanley Read the other reviews on the first page. Go ahead, I'll wait...OK have you finished? Good. Now remove anything positive anyone said about this movie. There is absolutely no way a sane person could enjoy this movie. I love watching bad movies but this movie is the worst of them all, taking 90 minutes of your life and giving nothing back. As another reviewer said: It is like a porn movie without the porn. It is a series of bedroom scene setups without the payoff.This movie is absolutely horrible and should be erased from human consciousness forever. Do NOT watch it and if you do, then for the love of all that is sacred at least do NOT pay money for that dubious privilege.
unlimited_freedom_avatar This looks like a high school project. It could pass as one. As a real movie, it was probably made with 5-6 amateur "actors" and a guy knowledgeable in computer-generated special effects, equipped with a medium-priced PC from the year 2000. What it really is, is a very bad Star Trek copy. Totally uninspired, a story without an end, it's among the worst movies I've ever seen. I'd recommend everyone involved in this production to not make a movie if they don't at least have a good story to tell. There are movies out there without too much special effects, but they're a success nevertheless, due to a good story. This one has practically no story at all, and everything else is just awful.
chesterdavisphd This movie had the production values of a 1970s Doctor Who episode. The acting and special effects are what you would expect of a low budget film, but really, couldn't they have tried a bit harder?The narration at the beginning gave some background that's necessary to understand the story but uses too much stock footage of real-life space missions and ships. Couldn't they have just started us off in the near future and described what happened next? Without giving too much away the story sort of ends at the beginning of a crisis. This isn't a TV series where a cliffhanger makes us want to tune in next week to see what happens. The plot was like a Star Trek episode in the middle of a Star Trek episode, and ending with the aforementioned Star Trek episode. Given the vast storytelling range covered by Star Trek this is somewhat excusable I guess. Overall, this movie doesn't have much to recommend it unless you want to know how NOT to do things in your own low-budget production.
grandmamusicme I thought I had seen some bad movies before, but this one makes the worst of them look like academy award material. I feel like I got robbed of a dollar by Redbox. OK, it's a B movie but give me a break. I can understand cheap sets and costumes, but the crew looked like they were wearing ill fitting pajamas from an outlet mall that only sells seconds. It looked like there was a large magnifying glass as part of the back of the captain's chair which would have made sitting a real blast. The part Klingon, part human cyborg wore walking casts for boots. The connections from the ship to the cyborg for regeneration were a big mess of loose telephone cable wires. You are kidding me right? One review said this was a family film. The only way I would classify this as a family film is if they meant it was made by a family of children as the production team. It appears to have been: 1. written by a 10 year old; 2. directed by a 9 year old; 3. produced by an 8 year old; 4. filmed by a 7 year old; 5. edited by a 6 year old; and 6. financed by a 5 year old's allowance. I nearly wet my pants at the end when when the helmsmen said "I didn't think it could get any worse." He should have said that line at the beginning and saved time I will never get back in my life.I did, however, laugh hysterically as my sister read all 4 pages of the reviews, one of which was submitted by someone claiming to be a member of the 9 person cast of actors who should be barred permanently from the acting profession. To call what they did acting would be an affront to the entire film and television industry.If I really wanted to torture my students it would be a toss up between showing this, or making them listen to Mrs. Miller sings the Beetles. Naaaaaaah this wins hands down.