JinRoz For all the hype it got I was expecting a lot more!

Mandeep Tyson The acting in this movie is really good.

Freeman This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.

Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

roxannkeating There are a lot of people out here who believe a lot of things, I am continually amazed by these videos, where the filmmaker is determined to show us how smart he is and how stupid everyone else is. Well, it really didn't work this time.I appreciate that Brian Flemming feels some sort of loss at having a "Christian Education" that was flawed. But seriously putting Charles Manson out there as a representative of the Christian Faith...and, trying to corner the Dean or Principal of the his former school--Epic Fail. Again, there are enough people out there that would gladly enter the debate--no need to blindside people.

jzakany I'm a Christian. I'm also extremely open-minded and a logical thinker. Yea, I know we all consider ourselves to be this way, but I've had more than one close friend say that I'm the most level headed person they know. They say I am willing to see things from another person's viewpoint better than anyone they know. When presented with an argument that contradicts my opinion or my belief, I pride myself in being able to consider the other person's position...that is, as long as they are willing to discuss the matter in an intelligent, civil manner. Brian Williams cannot do this.I had been debating internally whether or not to watch the movie. Not because I was afraid my faith would be shaken, but because I didn't know if I wanted to spend 90 minutes of my life listening to something that might be someone else's ludicrous argument. For example, I had seen Bill Maher's "Religuous" and it was full of asinine statements. He interviewed people who were just ordinary folks or fringe believers, and he mocked them. He didn't have the guts to debate experts who have studied the religion. The priest of my local parish would have ripped Maher to shreds in a debate over religion.So, I took a chance and started the movie. Right off the bat Williams starts with poor logic then he insults me. The movie starts out saying the church once believed the Sun revolved around the Earth. Since they were wrong about that could they be wrong about other things? This is poor logic because nowhere in our dogma does it say that salvation required a follower to believe the Sun revolved around the Earth. Human's lack of understanding of the mechanics of the universe, and their insistence on adhering to a false understanding of those mechanics, doesn't prove or disprove the existence of God, either.Williams then immediately jumped into a series of short quips of Christians explaining who Jesus was (i.e. "the Son of God" or "the Messiah, the Saviour of the World"). Williams narration points out that these Christians are smiley, happy people, but not all Christians are like them. He then starts rolling a series of pictures of deranged people who have committed horrific acts in the name of God.Screw you, Williams. These people were not followers of God. They were insane. Your insinuation that Christians are evil, disturbed people or a belief in God drives people to commit atrocious acts is insulting to me. Because of the nature of humans there are good and bad people in EVERY aspect of life! If you want to debate the existence of Jesus, fine. If you want to do it by insulting me and my faith, then you're on your own.I turned off the movie after 3 minutes.

Joe Demshar Scholastically this is a horrible movie, historically it picks and chooses facts to back up the director/writers argument, and from a religious standpoint he acts irresponsibly by grabbing lines from the bible and from other religions to express misplaced anger. I will argue this simply to make it quicker.First off you can't make an argument, such as the argument about the earth centric universe, to argue that Christians are wrong to believe in Jesus because they once believed in the earth centric universe. I know Christians who believe that god placed dinosaur bones in the ground as a joke for us to dig upNext he tries to make a historical placement argument. It is well known in educated circles that the scriptures were written well after the life of Jesus but all the information we know historically backs the life and time Jesus would have lived in. Historically all the major figures in the Jesus story are known to have existed in the same time period. The director also moves on to speak about how Saul/Paul didn't speak of Jesus as being a real person and never mentions him as being in the near past. He goes so far as to say that, "Everyone Forgot" about Jesus himself until the gospels were written. Next he tries to use the gnostic texts, known to have been written much later by fanatic Christians.Lastly he looks at other religions to corroborate his argument. Greek Mythology and Judaism feature heavily are spoken of off and on throughout the documentary. Namely he lists many Greek hero's that have comparisons to the life of Jesus but this type of evidence is used by people across the world and through time to substantiate a very weak argument.In the end I just ask all who watch this movie to not take it as totally false or totally real but read as much as you can to learn the truth yourself. I , as a historian, am offended by his method of presentation and while I have not argued as many problems as I saw with this film I wish you to know there were many.

TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews This is a documentary with a length of 52 and a half minutes sans credits(an hour and half a minute with). It consists of interviews with historians, college professors(and similar experts), as well as various random Christians, narration, and clips of films(old and new, all of them dealing with the belief, including The Torture Porn of The Christ). The subject is whether or not Jesus existed, and if he was what he is said to be, or a mere human being. That in and of itself is a worthwhile exploration, and plenty of compelling evidence is presented, and it should open many minds, since it is among the best arguments against that brand of monotheism, objectively speaking(meaning, outside of the ethical ones). However, perhaps on account of his own past fundamentalism within it, director Brian Flemming doesn't stop there, and makes numerous digressions, of varying credibility and maturity(sadly reflecting negatively on the main idea of this, which, again, ought to be shared and spread), such as when he exhibits the need to contrast people happy when explaining the life and application of their saviour with detailing some of the horrors committed in his name. While it's fine to discuss the latter, that's not particularly what's done here, it's used for shock value and almost as if the man helming this production can't say something positive about the other side without also saying something awful, and with a distinct sense of him needing to convince himself(more so than us) that it's a good thing he abandoned his faith. This is something that one gets past later in their atheism(or new supernatural concept), and I get the impression that he should simply have made this later(Richard Dawkins, he is not). This does take a look(or rather a glance) at the evils inspired by(or otherwise linked to) religion, but it is fairly superficial and one-sided, more intent to point fingers than examine(you'll note that Sam Harris is one of those talked to). It is telling that he takes us to the school he went to, confronting its leader, and as important as it is to fight indoctrination, you can't shake the feeling that he's getting payback(pulling him down from the moral high ground). All in all, however, this is good(and it could have been even better). I recommend it to anyone who wants to know more about this(and as usual, research it yourself as well... don't take someone else's word for it). 7/10