Mjeteconer
Just perfect...
Jenni Devyn
Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.
writers_reign
Although Michel Audiard was still trying a little too hard to prove he was fit to change the typewriter ribbons of the great quartet of French screenplay writers, Jacques Prevert, Jean Aurenche, Charles Spaak and Henri Jeannson (with, of course, a nod to Aurenche's long-time partner Pierre Bost) there is much to admire in this eight-hander in which all four performances - Romy Schneider, Guy Marchand, Michel Serrault and Lino Ventura - sparkle like vintage wine albeit wine being sipped whilst watching Gotterdamarung at Bayreuth. It's one of those films where plot is a bad nowhere to Theme and where cat-and-mouse aspires to be St. George And The Dragon but fails in the stretch. What remains is a Master-Class in Screen Acting, a mood and a tension - if Audiard can spare a little word-play.
R. Ignacio Litardo
Lino Ventura, M. Serrault and Romy Schneider. What else can you say? And Guy Marchand (from the seedy detective series "Nestor Burma"). The script flows like a clockwork orange, of course aided by Serrault, who could make rocks weep, laugh and commit suicide. Lino Ventura is believable, almost likable, as a tough cop who "doesn't really care who gets nailed" but can't forget the young victims, and won't be distracted from a suspect even if he's got style and wit.Why does the ending disappoint? Probably a tad melodramatic and manipulative, it doesn't harm an already superb film. It only makes it far from perfect. I agree with IMDb's reviewer "Taylor, from Ottawa" that "night scenes in a steady rain" by Bruno Nuytten create the perfect oppressive if somewhat awkward climate, necessary for this theatrical plot to unfold. Enjoy, if possible on a damp night :)!PS: The remake "Under suspicion"... Hackman is fine, but can't reach Michel's subtlety and yet how disagreeable he can be; he seems born for this "gifted neurotics" roles. Monica Bellucci is nice, but cannot carry the nostalgia Schneider exudes. W. Chisholm's review on Amazon is right she shows Visconti's training. Adaptations should only be made when improving on the original, don't you think :)?
MrBiddle
What keeps us going - or at least what I feel the writer wanted us to keep us glued at an early point is our desire to know whether Martinaud has done the dirty deed. Without spoiling so much, of course there is a red herring and a twist. But then we discover that this is the story of Martinaud's imperfections and his difficulty in coping. When there is the revelation - we begin to sympathize and pity him because as the story progresses we are made to think he is the sick, perverted pedophiliac that we're predisposed to have in mind. One of those things he has to cope with is the distant gap he and his wife have even though they live on the same roof. These problems of course are given their denouement in the film's shocking finale.This movie demands your patience and it has certainly tried those of restless teenagers sitting at the rear. They were heckling obviously because they aren't partial to "central location" films. Although there is a bit of travelling, when we get to the woods and the beach. And we realize that Gallien isn't as clever as we are made to think he is.The Inquisitor is Grade A-
Pierre Croteau
At the beginning of this movie, while credit titles are still running, you are immersed in an atmosphere that mix your feelings, with dark winter night, clapping rain on windows and a marvelous music (composed by Georges Delerue) which evoke merry-go-round, barrel organ and festive childhood.And then the music stops and you enter in an austere police office for a questioning on the murder of two children.No show off. No special effects. Dialogue.And you discover how sad and lonesome adults can be sometimes in their games or duties.Excellent movie.
