Spidersecu Don't Believe the Hype

Fairaher The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.

Jonah Abbott There's no way I can possibly love it entirely but I just think its ridiculously bad, but enjoyable at the same time.

Raymond Sierra The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

dbdumonteil look she said while opening the curtains,here they are ......"inspired by the poem by Victor Hugo "Les Pauvres Gens" " appears after the last picture ;This is one of my favorite poems ,an epic one which depicts the struggle of humble fishermen and their wives :Jeanie and her husband are poor and they live in a hut by the sea ;their neighbor ,a widow ,dies .Unbeknownst to their spouse,they both decide to take in the two orphans ."Nous Avions Cinq Enfants ,Cela Va En Faire Sept" (we had five children ,now it will make seven).Humble heroes in the shadow ,like Marie-Claire and her husband.And there was this old song ,one of the big hits of French Winter 1966-67, a wintry song by Pascal Danel ,who said he was inspired by Hemingway .This is really a memorable wonderful song which thoroughly deserved its success.And there was Darroussin and Ascaride ,both in a Cesar caliber performance ;the actress is absolutely sublime when they sing the song to celebrate their wedding anniversary ,a scene to rival the best of the classic cinema of Pagnol, Carné ,Duvivier or Grémillon ;I cannot think of another living actress whose face expresses compassion or true happiness as Miss Ascaride does .All her life ,she had to sacrifice her dearest dreams (becoming a nurse ,and now spending the Holiday of her lifetime ) and yet she says ,"I've always been happy" :so strong is her conviction that we do believe her .There's a stunning chemistry between her and Darroussin whose playing is miraculous too :an unionist whose illusions have gone,slowly by inexorably ,down the drain:but he remained true to himself ,true to Jean Jaurès,the great pacifist who was the first French victim of WW1;his "return good for evil" philosophy shows that sincere socialism (not the champagne socialists) and Jesus Christ's words (not the political Church)-without a single hint at religion in the film- come to the same conclusion ,Victor Hugo Guédiguian mentions at the end of his work was a Christian and a socialist .And there is Mr Guédiguian :we already knew ("La Ville est Tranquille " and other magnificent generous works) he was one of the greatest living directors in France ,along with Philippe Lioret ,with whom he shares the same sympathy for the human kind ;they show ,like Frank Capra and Frank Borzage in America before them ,that finer feelings may mean,when a clever director is in control, deeply moving efforts .No sex ,no violence (except for two short sequences )) ,no commercial dishonest compromise;as high as Kilimandjaro!

Costas Papachristou The question is simple but is far from being rhetorical: Should Art be an imitation of life, or should it be the other way around? The advocates of realism will surely make the first choice. In their view, life is full of ugliness that Art must faithfully portray, with absolutely no recourse to artificial embellishments. Often, the artist cannot even see the difference between realism and pessimism. In the case of cinema, in particular, the audience must leave the theater filled with dark thoughts and feelings of vanity. Happy ending is a taboo, and the positive message is hard to find (since life itself doesn't support it). On the opposite side of realism, idealism reserves a more noble and ambitious role for Art; namely, to create high standards of thinking and behavior, thus offering psychological, ideological and aesthetic motivation for man to overcome the inherent weaknesses of his/her nature and reach these standards. Robert Guédiguian's wonderful movie "The Snows of Kilimanjaro" (France, 2011) masterfully balances between these two opposite philosophical trends. On the one hand, there are the hard realities of our time: the economic recession and consequent unemployment, the growing youth resorting to crime, the refutation of the visions of the Left, and the (non-glorious) compromise of the latter with modern neoliberalism where there is no social care for the weak. On the other hand –and these are the elements progressively dominating the film up to the final catharsis- scenes of incredible beauty parade through the eyes of the viewer, exhibiting a triumph of friendship, humanity, forgiveness, solidarity (a worthy substitute for absent state care)... And, above all, love and togetherness that keep a marriage alive over time and against the difficult challenges of life! We left the theater full of positive thoughts and feelings. Finally leaving behind the painful memories of sickening movies by Michael Haneke or the Coen brothers...

marcoaponte After a traumatic incident in their home, we see a trade unionist and his wife, hard-core socialists, questioning the turn their lives have taken over the years, too comfortable, too middle-class. Have we become like those rich people we used to fight? they wonder. Set in Marseilles, this story is compelling, cleverly structured, and very moving. Performances are outstanding, particularly from the two leads: Ariane Ascaride as Marie Claire and Jean Pierre Darrousin as Michel. They wonder about the choices they made, the confront their own children, and they make new choices trying to recover their lost passion for equality and class struggle. Photography is beautiful and includes several shots of the Marseille Harbour. I saw this film on Saturday 15 September 2012 at the Prince Charles in London as part of the London Labour Film Festival.

stensson What is solidarity? Solidarity in the union way? It seems easy in the beginning of this film, even if it's a decision which is to your own disadvantage. People have to go from the factory, there's a lottery and this union leader is among them. He didn't want any special treatment.But this thinking and feeling is challenged, when one of his coworkers robs him and his wife. Why did he do that? It's a result of compromises from the union, leaving the robber and his kid brothers in misery.So the screw is turned. Do you want revenge or do you blame yourself for lacking solidarity? The problem is solved in a way which shouldn't be mentioned here, but the answer is much easier than the questions.