The Taking

2013
1.8| 1h17m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 12 April 2013 Released
Producted By: BAPart Films
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Two strangers must discover a way to escape a sinister family who wishes to sacrifice their souls to an evil presence.

Genre

Horror, Thriller

Watch Online

The Taking (2013) is currently not available on any services.

Cast

Director

Cezil Reed, Lydelle Jackson

Production Companies

BAPart Films

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
The Taking Videos and Images
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

The Taking Audience Reviews

Lovesusti The Worst Film Ever
Pacionsbo Absolutely Fantastic
Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.
Kailansorac Clever, believable, and super fun to watch. It totally has replay value.
Leofwine_draca THE TAKING is another dreadful indie horror flick that consists of people running around in the woods while being pursued by overactors. It's about a young couple who find themselves the victims of a creepy woodland family and who must strive to escape. There's some style here and the high resolution visuals make it look better than expected for an indie flick but I can't help but feel this would have worked better as a short.
danny-boy-112-369951 While wrong-turn backwoods horrors are a-dime-a-dozen, this film explores something more than mere murder and mayhem. The creepy grand matriarch of a motley band of misfits has some metaphysical mojo and a yin for your yang, making a powerplay for your very soul. You float in a wooded bardo, the naked expanse between an unrelenting sun shining into every hidden corner of your psyche with incisive intensity and a dark moon which threatens to swallow you whole. In three days, you are to be sacrificed, but first your very being will be pared down using the sharp edge of your own fears and desires, layer by layer, to your innermost core. Gooooood times.The film uses a slow, smoldering burn to build the existential horror of the protagonists' predicament, with flurried sights and booming, dissonant sounds a la Lars von Trier's "Antichrist." While certainly not as masterful as von Trier, the film is an encouraging and refreshing feature debut. Given the use of the anglicized version of Carl Jung as the name of a main character, the film is also reminiscent of Jesse Holland and Andy Mitton's "Yellowbrickroad," for its depiction of a spooky forest pulling double duty as a vast Jungian jungle of the collective unconscious in which the mythic archetypes of our collective psyche must be fought or fled from.This is an intelligent person's horror film, rather than the tired, skull-effingly boring formulism that typifies the vast majority of today's additions to the genre. My only critiques are (1) that the old woman's dialogue, which I'm fairly certain the audience is meant to be able to understand, is often post-processed to the point of inaudible oblivion, and (2) some of the dialogue's verbiage from other characters sounds a little pedestrian and lacking in polish, incongruent with the contextual gravity of the scenes in which it is spoken. That said, originality and departure from formulism go a helluva long way with me, as does the film's ability to provoke deep thought about dense existential subject matter. So I give it 6.5 stars out of 10.As is so often the case when a thinking person's film gets bad reviews and bad ratings, it is for no other reason than so very many people will just not get it---or rather will not expend any more thought trying to "get it" than is necessary to process the short-attention-span, re-hashed dross that relentlessly churns out of the Hollywood conveyor. (Speaking of short attention spans, those giving just 1 star in their reviews all admit they were too impatient to get beyond around the 15-minute mark.) YES, it did have a plot and well-defined, if cryptic, narrative, and YES the film had a point, a compelling one at that. So when can bad reviews on art-house films safely be ignored? When they are suspiciously rock-bottom 1-star reviews that go beyond simply, "This film wasn't my cup of tea," to the spitting of angry venom, yet with a complete lack of any specific citations of supposed failure---a petty tirade which is nothing more than a thinly disguised declaration that, "This film made me feel stupid, so I hated it." All art-house films are plagued by these. Ignore them.So, if you want gratuitous gore or torture porn with no dramatic underpinning and no existential substance, and if you want a director that will spoonfeed you neatly appointed plot points and resounding narrative resolutions, then look elsewhere, as this piece surely leaves the drooling masses wanting and wailing. If, however, you like a directorial and writing style that doesn't capitulate to formulaic demands for right-angled scene construction and all literary exposition through spoken dialogue, but instead tasks the viewer with finding meaning from the cinematic language and the consideration of mythic archetypes, then look no further.Whoops! Sorry, I've got to dumb that down for the drooling masses, don't I? Fear what you don't understand? Movie bad. Want refreshingly original filmmaking that tries something new? Movie good. Want big-budget blood, boobs, and booms? Movie bad. Want cinematic subtlety singing a sinister serenade? Pass the popcorn.
sajpratt-82-265277 At what point does the Film School professor say to the wannabe writer- director-filmmaker, "Look, you're a nice kid and full of energy and enthusiasm, and I know being able to make films can be both lucrative and cool and so forth but, well, like any other art-form, it takes at least a modicum of creative talent. Have you thought about transferring over to the MBA program?"Sadly, we won't hear this very often these days, largely because, in their desire for funding and patronage, universities today will welcome any jock who has ever fallen in love with casting-couch porn and has the cash up front. The only possible redeeming quality this movie might possess--in fact, the only reasonable explanation this project ever got off the ground--is that it allowed yet another film-crew to earn a living, and I think that is exactly what *real* producers these days, between *real* projects, have in mind when they allow such a tragedy of a film to actually make it to the editing suite.Play this movie while napping or out shopping to make the burglars think you're awake/at home. If you could somehow roll it up and shred it, you couldn't find a better use for it than lining Felix's litter box.
debshatton Im sorry.. I love Horror Movies...and I am all for New talent coming along, even making movies on small budgets..and I have seen many good ones....But, THIS..... Dreadful start ...couldnt make head nor tail of it...had no idea what was going on...Acting...Bad...and i mean, Bad. The music was dire, and all the shaky camera shots ( trying to be arty i assume, but failed ) was making it very hard to watch. The blood effects, were bad too. sorry, i wouldn't even waste your time watching this... even i didn't make it to the end...i had totally had enough of it and the bad music . Seriously...I dare you to try and make it to the end of this drivel. There is nothing Original in this story at all..which is a shame for people trying to break into the Horror genre, or just movie making in general. This looks like it was made on a university Campus during Halloween week. Epic Fail. And I really do not like to see new up and coming movie makers Fail, but, honestly this did.