Platicsco Good story, Not enough for a whole film

Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Scarlet The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

buncheseyes Almost all of the so called research as prior video, pictures, statements and stories. So far they have not proved or debunked any sighting they researched. Some of the episodes are almost comical, as they always investigate a sight at night which is really dumb if you want to search the ground for evidence. Also, if you wish to catch a better picture or video of a UFO, you should have the camera equipment to do so. Most of their own material they show, is of the same quality as the normal everyday cell phone. My opinion, a waste of time in which every investigation is cut off by Lions ,Tigers and Bears Oh My !!!!!! lmbooo

nufosmatic This is a very disappointing series. Given the presence of James Fox (Out of the Blue), I was hoping for better. There is much silly dashing about through the night with low-tech, low-light cameras in sadly under-analyzed locations in spite of a team that apparently has some very nice technology available and, in general, really should know better.That having been said, the very first episode, "Texas Is For Sightings", regarding the fairly recent Stephenville, Texas, UFO flap, would be the reason I kept watching. The team was successful in calling a community meeting and eliciting eyewitness testimony from many residents of Stephenville and the surroundings AS A GROUP, with special focus on some quality "trained observers". This is some of the most compelling television I have ever seen on any subject involving a local mystery of any sort, let alone UFOs.In this episode is also the most compelling UFO lights-in-the-sky video (albeit short in time) I have ever seen taken by people who where out videoing the sky with the specific purpose of finding UFOs.http://www.nufosmatic.com/

nchuni Chasing UFO's? More like chasing a purpose. More quality entertainment and informative programming are needed from Channels like National Geographic.The series at first look - the title - before watching an episode - would seem to be a very interesting perspective on UFO's. It would seem at first look that a National Geographic series would be based on a journalistic style as have appeared in the magazines.But even watching just one episode - no substance or authentic purpose appears. Either it is wrong to expect some purpose or not - chasing UFO's insults the viewer.As most people would expect - channels like History, Military, TLC and A&E in the past have tried to report and inform. Now we see this trend offered for the public entertainment. But shows like these are not entertaining but silly.Weird camera angles, whispering at night, pretending to be chasing anything real and false evidence appearing real - such as a marsupial passed off as a potential alien. They proposed the idea of an alien - but at the very end that idea was debunked. Of course it wasn't. It lead the viewer of a possibility - maybe keep watching after the break - but since no other real evidence was available an obvious earthly mammal was proposed to the viewer. Didn't think anyone thought it could be an alien. Maybe expectations don't match reality. Days of informative and enlightening episodes such as A&E Biography, TLC True Crimes or History Channel's Vietnam on HD maybe dying but don't insult the viewer. Either way the series is not entertaining or informative. One star out of many only because it serves no purpose or does it serve as an engaging series. Cable T.V is expensive enough - we don't want to be slapped in the process. However other shows on National Geographic channels are good this one isn't. So, dear networks provide us with only quality entertainment and informative episodes we pay for! More shows that change the way we see ourselves and the world are needed. Hope that come soon.

Bonnie McEwan Every episode shows the team of paranoid chasers bungling in the dark, shrieking with fear when they hear an animal or slip in the mud, carrying expensive equipment and filming close-ups of their green faces with the night vision camera, and they never gather any credible evidence. All the fright seems to come from their close calls climbing fences and hills and almost falling down. They curse (beeped out) and say things like, "There's definitely more than meets the eye here!" But no credible evidence. It would be more interesting if they were arrested for trespassing occasionally or if they were chased by a bear. There is a lot of whispering into the microphone and running in the dark with the camera bopping up and down on their face, then they rendezvous to share their horror stories and to share their suspicions. But unfortunately, no credible evidence. The best part is the interviews with the witnesses--they are the only believable and interesting part of the show.