Aurora

1998 "A brave new world. A struggle for survival."
3.5| 1h27m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 25 May 1998 Released
Producted By: Rara Avis Films
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

In the 22nd century, seven explorers set out on a mission to earth's nearest sister planet, AURORA. Their mission - to survey and explore for future colonization. When their ship suddenly malfunctions, the crew is forced to crash land on the planet's surface, where crippling heat, poisonous water, and fierce storms threaten their lives at every turn. With a handful of supplies and little hope of rescue, their only option is a grueling four hundred mile trek to their ship's lost supply bunkers. To survive, the men will have to push their endurance to the limit and entrust their lives to a leader who will risk everything to succeed, no matter what the consequences.

Watch Online

Aurora (1998) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Christopher Kulikowski

Production Companies

Rara Avis Films

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Aurora Videos and Images

Aurora Audience Reviews

Solemplex To me, this movie is perfection.
SunnyHello Nice effects though.
Beanbioca As Good As It Gets
Fairaher The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.
Andy McGregor I am normally supportive of Independent films, whether award winning or otherwise, but this film made me re-assess my loyalties. I appreciate low budgets can have detrimental affects to a film's production - whatever. This film is tedious! In no way does this film resemble 2001:Space Oddessy - or Red Planet for that matter. The closest experience to watching this film I could draw any similarities to, would be watching grass growing. The acting wasn't terrible (it wasn't good though!) and - yes, the special effects weren't really too good. The camera-work did at times go over the score a little. What really let this film down was the script and storyline. I'm sure it can't be easy to write a film, but whatever you could come up with could not be any worse than the 80 mins of drivel I was subjected to. What made the script-writer think anyone would want to watch this and actually be entertained by it? God only knows!
mike wright (BigMikeWright) Fundamentally a boring film. The idea could have made a good film, but this isn't it. It seems cheaply made, with little characterisation or acting abilities. To simulate an aline landscap they use a filter to give everything a strange colour. Very unimpressive. They walk for practically the entire film, and tat is as exciting as it gets
leevmlafn1 This is to the reviewer who mentioned that it was low budget and made on credits cards, so please give it its due. Sorry, that doesn't wash. I've seen other movies made on shoestring budgets that managed to be good despite their low budgets. And since most people won't know it was made on a shoestring budget, they only have the finished product to judge, and that seems to be lacking. Heck, Robt. Rodriguez made EL MARIACHI for $7000 (not including the soundtrack that now exists on the video; that was cleaned up by Columbia Pictures when they bought the rights, and spent $100,000 doing it) and look what he did; sometimes it's edited a bit too fast for me in one or two scenes)A movie lives or dies by what's on the screen, not the history behind the making of the movie.
a55965 I Can only assume that the people putting the film down have not realised that the film was made on a shoe string it was an independant film the director had occupied more roles than Simon Templar , location and story was easily more admirable and just as good as Val kilmers flop the red planet if not better in my opinion , we must not see independant films as crap films but as films to be developed as a budding filmaker my self it is quite inspiringTAKE NOTICE AND DONT MOCK WE ALL WILL HAVE START SOMEWHERE