Smartorhypo Highly Overrated But Still Good

AnhartLinkin This story has more twists and turns than a second-rate soap opera.

Humaira Grant It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

Portia Hilton Blistering performances.

Arun M R The Doctor's brothers Sanjay & Bobby (both scripted by Lal Jose for the first time) are screening scenes in the field service scene and some kind of service minds. Dr Prithviraj presents 'Aryan' in the film. That is Ravi Tharakan. The other characters tell me about him (he and I am in the middle of it) is the unveiling of Ravi Thakkar. But there is the story of the story in the atmosphere that is less familiar, but "goodness" and some of the encounter scenes that are trying to reach the audience on each occasion are fraudulent. Dr is from an accident that was shown at the start of the film. The Ravi Tharakan disappears and the story that tells colleagues and friends about him. But in the first instance of this (the hospital scene) the audience may not be a clear or satisfying cause. The second half of the first half after the first half seemed better. Performance is better with actors than scenes.

oksanchic2013 It's quite a challenge to write a review about such a movie as "Between him and me" as whatever I'm trying to say sounds nothing comparing to my feelings about the film.Writing any review you're trying to indicate the main issue. But what if every moment, every word, every glance is the main thing? Looking at the posters, promo, stills and reading about "ANT" I thought the film was about the medical world. But it is not. Well, it is, but just 10% of the movie. Together with the characters you'll think who a heaven-born doctor is and what it is being a doctor. Who can make decisions about life and death? Family? Yes, this is what the laws say. But what if the family being hysterical can't think adequately? Should a doctor save life despite their opinion? And does he have such a right? And can a doctor forget his main goal – saving life – working in compliance with the laws? Or should he risk and take a chance even if it means ruining his reputation?But the movie is much bigger than that. What I loved the most about "ANT" is that there you won't find any flawless and totally positive heroes. Every character is a real person with his/her strengths and weaknesses. Maybe this is why a viewer can emphasize. Hats off to the filmmakers for letting us observe how Dr Ravi has been growing up. We see a light-minded student who thinks more about having fun, parties and love than his studies, and can't even write down a diagnosis told by a patient. But the life hit him so terribly that my heart was bleeding watching his sufferings. You can't avoid the feeling how it happens in life – one tiny filth can cause huge evil sprouting terrible despair which can deprive of all morality, and even a decent person can lose a human face risking someone's life. Doesn't it happen in real life? You're looking at the man and can't stop feeling anger as despise him. But at the same moment you realize that this person (that cop) has ruined his life, just like that, for fun, showing-off… and you understand the doctor and the reasons of his cruelty… but other people can't be responsible for actions of their relatives, even if they are the worst people on earth… despising but understanding – all feelings put together…Just like a snowball starts with only one snowflake, some tiny evil can lead to terrible consequences ruining lives. But an act of kindness can heal better than any medicine. We watch how Dr Samuel acts against his principles, but he believes in Dr Ravi and forgives his mistake and gives him second chance. What if he hadn't done it? Would have been there the same Dr Ravi who is ready to risk his reputation for saving lives? I don't think so. If a person has a heart I don't think he/she can remain indifferent to "ANT" as it's a smart and delicate movie.As for the actors, Prithvi was just brilliant! I felt every emotion with him. I didn't realize it was just a movie, really forgot about it –so amazing work he did. He appeared in different images starting from a young reckless guy to a passionate loving man, from an intern found himself face-to-face with real world in a hospital without any cheat- sheets to a broken man – Prithviraj can play everything. Hats off, Prithvi!Samvrutha – I don't like this actress and with every movie even more. But her part is not big and helps to show Dr Ravi, nothing more. So OK. Anyway I would prefer any other girl playing Sainu. As for Rima and Remya – liked both of them, beautiful girls and good performance. Narain – love this guy. So sad his role is not big. Charming, nice looking, good actor. My favourite scene is when Vivek is watching the news on TV about his best friend being in trouble. All palettes of emotions are in his eyes. Well, resuming my thoughts, this film is like a little life and this is why no words can describe it in a way it deserves. It's just one of the best movies I've watched in years.My obeisance to the whole crew as everything is brilliant in this film.

Tejas Nair Probably I was mesmerized more by the non-linear story-telling or the wonderful acting by the electrifying cast in this well-directed movie concerning a cause so prevalent in the Indian backlog.Prithviraj is fantastic and I know why he was awarded. Prathap Pothan is the cynosure of this good script written by people who have given us classic like Traffic. Lal Jose does the magic again after his sweet comedy Diamond Necklace. I was taken aback by the level of detailing in this flick as it progresses with a punch of suspense about the vividness of the doctor profession. The minutiae is terrific and the music/score backs it greatly. Supporting cast like Samvrutha & Remya & Narain & Rima have done well with what was given to them. Kalabhavan Mani and his part of story is one of the USP of one of the very few films of 2012 which dents the universe as well as stamps a message. Ustahd Hotel, 22FK, Ee Adutha Kalathu & Spirit intrigued me.It was high time someone delivered an unconventional & experimental movie to Indian cinema & I am glad I watched ANT. Only, that some sequences and humor were predictable & vague, I really enjoyed the 130 minutes of inventive screenplay.BOTTOM LINE: Ayalum Njanum Thammil is a massive entertainer & true cinema with all the factors taken care of; one that gives a message and a take on a series of day-to-day activities and paradoxes of life and is well-executed. Kudos!WATCH OUT FOR: Subtlety of the movie, Prithviraj & Prathap Pothan!Can be watched with a typical Indian family? YESLanguage: No | Sex, Nudity or Foreplay: No | Violence: Strong | Gore: Mediocre | Smoking, Alcohol or Drugs: No | Vulgarity: No

Cinish Narayanan The movie does hold on well. It is the story of a youngster learning life lessons. A change from personal pleasures to a meaningful committed life.Some situations were quite convincing. Songs are there but they hardly interfered with the movie. Some humor too in the movie but does not stand out as much.Prathap Poththan has been the best performer of the movie. Prithviraj has done well too. The movie has tried to push some pieces of life around you into the movie and has done well with that to a reasonable extent.Interspersing past and present has been neatly done , presenting relevant sections from past and present one after the other without confusing the viewer.In line with the current trend in the malayalam movie industry, this movie also does not take roads often travelled. The movie is presenting pieces that are new, that have not had a history of being big sells, but they do make the mark for most.