Indianapolis Speedway

1939 "IS THE GLORY OF VICTORY WORTH THE PRICE!"
5.7| 1h25m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 05 August 1939 Released
Producted By: Warner Bros. Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

A champion auto racer who unhappily learns his kid brother wants to enter the same profession rather than finish school.

Genre

Drama, Action, Romance

Watch Online

Indianapolis Speedway (1939) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Lloyd Bacon

Production Companies

Warner Bros. Pictures

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Indianapolis Speedway Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Indianapolis Speedway Audience Reviews

Plantiana Yawn. Poorly Filmed Snooze Fest.
RipDelight This is a tender, generous movie that likes its characters and presents them as real people, full of flaws and strengths.
Quiet Muffin This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.
Fleur Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.
michaeljhuman Some spoilers maybe, sorryI think I saw this before "As the Crowd Roars". I don't remember liking that one much either.The characters are not interesting. The lead character is a jerk. The girlfriend seems like she's supposed to be intelligent but stays with him in spite of his annoying behavior ( I guess that's not totally unrealistic, seen that in real life.)The younger brother should have been in a racing movie of his own. He at least showed a little charisma,You might be surprised to hear the thing that annoyed me the most - the screeching of tires...on dirt tracks...sighWhy did the THREE TIME INDY champion suddenly suck and his far more inexperienced brother suddenly become a world beater - that's a pretty unlikely scenario. Takes years of high level competition to win at the highest level. Maybe he was just a born genius even better than his brother but it seemed pretty unbelievable.The racing was awful. You can't drive a race car like that. Sad how few movies have anything resembling believable racing. Really sad actually as racing can be beautiful.The plot, well...you have seen it before.If there was any one part that was good, acting, plot, dialog, racing something...maybe I could give it a higher score,See Grand Prix instead. Seen it already? See it again :) Or maybe watch Le Mans (if you can stay awake :)Don't like to be so negative but I couldn't get into this movie.
irishfou Although this was a remake as the 3 other reviewers cite, it was well done with refreshing portrayals by Ann Sheridan, and Gail Page. Pat O'Brian? please, he's a genius. in the thirties, unlike today, the oldest sibling did take up for the family more often than not, in fact my grandfather turned down a chance to go to college (notre dame) because his father passed away and he went to work to support his mom and siblings. I think the train scene early on set the tone of what kind of guy Joe is and then when seeing his brother not in school, who could blame him for being upset. This movie is a wild ride with great old racing footage, including a (non fatal in real life) fiery crack up that was actually a driver named Friday from the mid-west. I loved the cast and I loved the movie, the two, The Crowd Roars & this one are in a virtual dead heat at the finish line.
MartinHafer The movie that this was based on, THE CROWD ROARS, starred Jimmy Cagney and was simply a better film in every way. Thanks to a very astute reviewer (Arthur Hauser), the footage of the races is identical in the second movie and many other scenes were just lifted from the original. So, apart from the remake not being original, why else did I dislike this film? I think the biggest reason was Pat O'Brien's character. While he was a controlling jerk in the original, in this case he also seems very shrill and totally unlikable. So here we have a retread movie with an unlikable star--what is left? Well, not much. All you really have is a time-passer. Period.It's really a shame. The actors in the movie were better than the material and the complete rip-off of the footage from the original makes this a cynical attempt by Warner Brothers to expend little money or effort to squeeze a few more bucks out of an ancient story.
Arthur Hausner In this remake of The Crowd Roars (1932), John Payne was more believable than Eric Linden was in the original, as the kid brother who wants to be a racing driver, but I'll take James Cagney over Pat O'Brien in the lead for this type of role. I also enjoyed the original female stars, Joan Blondell and Ann Dvorak, more than Ann Sheridan and Gale Page in this film. Still, both films were comparable in enjoyment for me. This film is almost a scene by scene remake, including the cute ending where each injured racing driver instructs his ambulance driver how to beat the other to the hospital. They still have racing in their blood even when it's spilled.I watched both films on successive days, so each was fresh in my mind. It was a shock to see how much footage from the earlier version was put in the later version. I'm sure it saved Warner Bros. lots of money and were it not for video tape recorders, nobody would notice. (I was also able to play both films simultaneously on two separate VCRs, stopping one when the other was playing, in order to quickly compare any two scenes.)The studio got away with using the old footage by several ways. First, the new screenplay used the same names (Joe Greer and Eddie Greer) for the brothers. This allowed the footage of the four announcers (Wendell Niles, Sam Hayes, John Conte and Reid Kilpatrick) for the three racing sequences of the first film to be incorporated in toto in the later film. They are extensive sequences involving hundreds of words and many images, but I am sure none of the four got a paycheck for this film, although some outtakes from the earlier film may have been used. Also, several other actors reprised their roles: Frank McHugh, Regis Toomey, John Harron, Ralph Dunn, Sol Gorss, Billy Arnold and Billy Wayne. Some new scenes were shot when they interacted with the new actors, but scenes otherwise were lifted from the earlier film. We see Frank McHugh coughing, laughing and finally dying when his car catches fire, all from the old footage. We see his wife crossing the track to get to him from the old footage, and even though the earlier wife was played by Charlotte Merriam and his wife in this film was Grace Stafford, you cannot tell the difference in longshot. But the police who restrain her made it obvious it was from the old footage. Old footage is also used when the pitmen, John Harron and Billy Wayne, signal the driver with signs. And every crash, spinout, fire, crowd scene as well as the cars racing around the track was from the old footage. (At one point a horse inexplicably appears on the track in both films at the same place.) When seen in closeup with the new actors, these cars had the same numbers painted on their sides, so that the announcers' descriptions made sense. All of the old footage, however, was smoothly edited in with the new. Since a good deal of the cost of the original film was in the racing sequences, this really was a great object lesson on how to remake a film cheaply.