Not for Publication

1984 "A scandalous comedy!"
4.9| 1h28m| R| en| More Info
Released: 01 November 1984 Released
Producted By: Samuel Goldwyn Company
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

A tabloid reporter and her new photographer, who've recently started working for the mayor of New York City, stumble upon evidence of conspiracy and political corruption that may involve their beloved mayor.

Genre

Comedy, Crime, Mystery

Watch Online

Not for Publication (1984) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Paul Bartel

Production Companies

Samuel Goldwyn Company

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Not for Publication Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Not for Publication Audience Reviews

Glucedee It's hard to see any effort in the film. There's no comedy to speak of, no real drama and, worst of all.
Sharkflei Your blood may run cold, but you now find yourself pinioned to the story.
Phillipa Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.
Cristal The movie really just wants to entertain people.
rockabilly-1 In this media saturated age, it's hard to remember a time when seeing an oddball film was hard to do. As I dare to share my age I was 17 or 18 when this film first popped up on Cinemax. Growing up in Iowa I read more about cult or pyschotronic movies than I had the chance to see them, so when a Paul Bartel movie showed up on cable it was something to see. I can't say it's a great movie, but it's odd mix of strange and sweet still makes it endearing to me. And hey, any movie that starts out with showgirls packing heat hunting down a sexist producer wins points with me. Plus Nancy Allen (a shame she doesn't get the respect she deserves for the brave work she did in the eighties) and a lot of oddball character actors makes this a fun film to watch for anyone who grew up loving the cult movies, actors, and directors of the seventies and eighties like I did.
TonyDood Bought this for $1 at a swap meet, got a couple laughs out of it--it has a good heart if it fails elsewhere (Nancy Allen and David Naughton REALLY couldn't act!). The musical number was dumb but in a sweet way--like "Eating Raoul" you have innocents living in a world of corruption (an orgy party where people dress up as animals in a light comedy...??!!!) and a director who can't seem to decide which world he likes more. I was pleased to see how "Bartel"-esque this actually was, with a decided "gay sensibility" going on underneath everything (note lingering shots of muscle-men in g-strings) and a residue after watching that makes you feel a little un-clean for some reason. Tries awfully hard for the rhythm of "His Girl Friday" and I appreciated the attempt.This is how the awful "Switching Channels" would have been with Bartel behind the wheel--still bad but at least with original moments.I'd watch this again before I'd return to the dark and filthy/scary world of Bartel's bleak "Private Parts..."This is destined to be a forgotten 80's film, a shame...didn't think it was so bad.
frankfob This jaw-droppingly unfunny, embarrassing "satire" on tabloid publications and political corruption has no pacing, no timing, no humor, no brains, no nothing. Paul Bartel has always been--for the most part, anyway--a good director with a wicked sense of humor, as the black comedy "Eating Raoul" and the hilarious parody "Death Race 2000" have shown, so God only knows what happened here, but this disjointed mess is virtually unwatchable. It makes Sylvester Stallone's hideous so-called comedy "Oscar" look like a sophisticated drawing-room farce by Noel Coward. An embarrassment for all concerned. You'll lose brain cells just reading the video box cover. You've been warned!