Wordiezett So much average

Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!

Candida It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

gridoon2018 By this point, the Charlie Chan series seemed to be going on autopilot: neither the director nor the cast (save maybe for Mantan Moreland) were showing much enthusiasm for the proceedings. In "Golden Eye", about half of the "action" takes place inside a mine, which makes the film look even cheaper and more underlit than usual. It's a bargain-basement and sleep-inducing production, and there aren't even any memorable lines for Chan! There is, however, (precisely) one scene that I did like: Wanda McKay grabbing a fake "nun/nurse" from behind and struggling a gun away from her; such initiative from a woman in a 1940s movie is uncommon to see. *1/2 out of 4.

Lechuguilla The story is set mostly in Arizona near an old gold mine. The owner is being threatened and wants Chan's help. It's a good premise but the story is dull and unconvincing. There are not enough suspects to make the puzzle interesting. The killer here is easier to figure out than in most Chan stories. There was one surprise toward the end but it only contributed to the story's implausibility.Characters are shallow and generally uninteresting. Way too much time is spent on the drunk who stumbles around the swimming pool. This character isn't really needed anyway and my impression is that he functions mostly as filler; the film contains a lot of filler, despite the short runtime.Outdoor visuals do not look much like Arizona. The mine-shafts add a spooky quality. But film lighting renders the tunnels too bright to be convincingly subterranean. Overall lighting is generally too dark. Production design is predictably minimal and cheap.As bug-eyed Birmingham Brown, Mantan Moreland is always a welcome addition to the cast. But Victor Sen Yung doesn't add much as Number Two Son. And Roland Winters is dreadful as Charlie Chan. Winters just doesn't have the Chan persona that Warner Oland or Sidney Toler had.With minimal mystery and suspense, few suspects, and a dull Charlie Chan actor, "The Golden Eye" is below average for this series. Only hard core Charlie Chan movie fans will find much appeal in this film.

binapiraeus This is a VERY unusual entry in the 'Charlie Chan' series: it starts, like most of the movies starring Roland Winters, in a clearly 'Noirish' atmosphere, with a man being mysteriously followed through the dark streets of Chinatown and a little later being shot at through the window in a shop - whose owner is Charlie's cousin, and the man called Manning came here to ask Charlie for help: in the past months, there have been made several attempts at his life. Manning's a rancher from Arizona, and he owns the 'Golden Eye' mine, which has been producing quite a lot of gold lately. So it's off to the 'Wild West' for Charlie, Tommy and Birmingham! And here, immediately the comedy element sets in: Tommy and Birmingham dress up for the occasion as 'real' cowboys... When they reach the ranch, which is also a big bungalow park, Charlie very soon meets an old acquaintance of his: Lt. Mike Rourke, who's playing the 'drunkard' in a MORE than convincing way to cover up for the investigations he's already making here; there DOES seem to be something wrong with the mine and its sudden gold production... Then Charlie gets to know Mr. Driscoll, the mine superintendent, and his wife, and young metal expert Bartlett - but just a little later, Manning meets with a very serious accident in his mine, falling down 40 feet and fracturing his skull, so that his whole head has to be bandaged and he's brought home to bed in a coma. Then, while everybody's waiting for Manning to recover, an old prospector turns up and gives Charlie a hint to a secret tunnel into the mine - but when Charlie and his assistants enter that tunnel, they find the old miner dead; so now they DEFINITELY know that there's some kind of foul play going on in that mine...A pretty strange environment for Charlie Chan, the big city gentleman - but a very effective one: by day, the cheerful atmosphere at the bungalow park lightens up the atmosphere; while the nightly scenes down in the mine shafts are EXTREMELY suspenseful. A VERY well-done piece of crime entertainment, with Roland Winters in his fourth appearance as Charlie Chan already obviously feeling very much at ease with his role!

MartinHafer This is one of the last of the Monogram series of Charlie Chan films. By 1948, the series had been around for many years--since the late 1920s. Through the decades, Warner Oland and Sidney Toler had made a ton of these fun murder mysteries. By the death Toler in 1946, it was obvious that the series had been gasping for life for several years. However, instead of calling a halt to the films, Monogram plodded along with several more Chan films that starred Roland Winters. Now Winters wasn't too bad--after all, with makeup he was able to look like Chan and his delivery was rather Chan-like (though a bit rapid). However, the wit of the Sidney Toler version was noticeably absent. Another problem is that by 1948, the movies just weren't as interesting and were usually written in such a hasty manner that plot holes abounded--and this one looked rather Swiss cheesy at that! I know this to be so because I have seen all of the Fox Charlie Chan films that are in existence and almost all the Monogram ones--the slide is obvious.Charlie is out west to investigate how a supposedly played out gold mine is suddenly brimming with gold. During the investigation, the man who hired Chan is supposedly hurt and his entire face is wrapped in gauze and doctors won't let anyone in to see him. It's so completely obvious to anyone with half a brain that either this isn't the man or he's being drugged. Oddly, Chan allows this ruse to continue for some time--even though someone's life might be at risk. Even when the nurse/nun who is caring for him reveals she's an idiot and practically knows nothing about medicine, Chan does nothing.In addition to lots of inaction, the film is brimming with dull and awkward performances. About the only one who comes off reasonably well is Tommy Chan--who oddly was re-named Tommy even though he'd been Jimmy in the earlier films and was still played by the same actor (Victor Sen Yung). Even the usual comic relief from Mantan Moreland seems very subdued in this film. There simply is no energy or life to this film and a few really broad performances sink the film further.The bottom line is that there isn't much of a mystery and Chan could easily get to the bottom of it. Instead, the amazingly subdued Chan sits back and lets the film go on for some time until the conclusion. Dull and uninspired.