The Haunting of Sarah Hardy

1989 "Sheer gothic suspense at its most wicked."
5.1| 1h32m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 31 May 1989 Released
Producted By: Wilshire Court Productions
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Sela Ward stars as beautiful, vulnerable heiress Sarah Hardy, recently wed and returning to her isolated childhood home, The Pines, to claim her vast inheritance. But something – or someone – evil waits there for her. It could be real. Or imagined. Whatever it is , it wants to drive Sarah into madness. And on the other side of madness lies murder. Featuring a tour de force performances by Morgan Fairchild and Polly Bergen, The Haunting of Sarah Hardy is sheer gothic suspense at its most wicked.

Watch Online

The Haunting of Sarah Hardy (1989) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Jerry London

Production Companies

Wilshire Court Productions

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
The Haunting of Sarah Hardy Videos and Images

The Haunting of Sarah Hardy Audience Reviews

Lovesusti The Worst Film Ever
Beystiman It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.
TrueHello Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.
Forumrxes Yo, there's no way for me to review this film without saying, take your *insert ethnicity + "ass" here* to see this film,like now. You have to see it in order to know what you're really messing with.
amanduh_huginkiss I love Sela Ward, so I watched this movie when it aired on TV last night, and at first it seemed like a campy thriller. It quickly turns into a "Lifetime Original Movie." I thought Sela's acting was terrible, which surprised me. Morgan Fairchild is pretty enough but can't hold a candle to Sela, and the man playing the husband (who I didn't recognize from anything before or since 1989) doesn't help the movie at all. I think it would have been saved by better writing in the latter half and better direction. It starts promisingly and goes downhill fast. It's dated, boring, predictable and the ending itself made me wish I hadn't even wasted two hours. Save yourself and skip this one.. It's too late for me.
Missy C POSSIBLE SPOILERS I caught this one on ABCFamily Channel the other night, and while the setting is beautiful and the actors do a great job with the material they're given, something about the whole thing was just. . .off.Sela Ward--who stands with Jennifer Aniston and Susan Sarandon as one of the most beautiful women in show biz today--has the title role. We also see Roscoe Born--who played Joe Novak in "Ryan's Hope"--as the childhood friend who's always been in love with Sarah and still is, even though she's chosen another man to marry. And Morgan Fairchild--another beautiful lady who, alas, always gets stuck with the second banana, duplicitous friend role. Michael Woods--a man with a very familiar face, maybe from print or TV ads--is Sarah's sexy new husband. (Someone give this man a starring role of his own--he's worth watching!!) Veteran actress and former cosmetics executive Polly Bergen is almost unrecognizable here as a longtime secretary/housekeeper to Sarah's family.This film is lovely to look at. Most of the action takes place at the mansion where Sarah grew up and has now returned to live as a newlywed. Both Sela and Morgan are elegantly dressed--although Morgan's clothing is always flashier, where Sela's is more understated and everyday elegant. And don't get me started on Michael Woods again--the man is a hunk:)The problems with this film begin in about the last half-hour to 45 minutes. It seems as though the directors took too much time setting things up, and then had to race to the finish, leaving out some things in the process. At the end of the film, you realize that there are two main characters who simply vanished from the storyline--and this would have been out of character for them, given the established plot. This is a real problem in the final scene, when it's implied that the previous scene happened early in the day and now it's night-time. The character who does not show up in the last scene would have definitely had time to get there and possibly change the outcome. Hello? What happened? Is there something we didn't see on the cutting room floor?Like the reviewer below, I think we either need a sequel or to have this one re-released with the Director's cut. But I would watch that first half-hour or so again just to watch Sela Ward and Michael Woods in the wedding and newlywed scenes. Someone give that man a show of his own!!
Jessi I thought the movie was very good. Thrilling. It had me literaly on the edge of my seat. But the ending was rather confusing. When it was over I said "Right, so they end it." I think they should have made a sequel.
yosef88 Initially interesting movie with a plot that held promise. Sela Ward's performance was better than what audiences have come to expect in television movies. The build up of suspense started with increasing expectancy. I felt that the ending was anti-climatic and sputtered into confusion. I give 3 stars out of 10.