Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

InspireGato Film Perfection

Odelecol Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

Jonah Abbott There's no way I can possibly love it entirely but I just think its ridiculously bad, but enjoyable at the same time.

jadavix "La estanquera de Vallecas" is the least interesting Eloy de la Iglesia movie I have seen yet. Reportedly trying to make a movie that would be more successful, de la Iglesia went for broad appeal, and yet still included his heavy dose of social realism, which didn't really mix with the humour.The plot concerns two inept criminals who attempt to rob a store. They are a middle aged man and a young man, the latter played by de la Iglesia regular Jose Luis Manzano. The robbery doesn't go well, as the lady behind the counter proves to be remarkably tenacious in fighting off the robbers and attracting attention to the area. Also inside the store is her niece, a young girl who at first is hampered with a dental plate marring her features and voice, but take my word for it, that is Maribel Verdu, the Spanish actress who would go on to worldwide fame in "Y Tu Mama Tambien" and "Pan's Labyrinth". It's hard to recognise her without the floatation devices she would later have strapped to her chest.The beginning scenes are entertaining and well handled. The reaction of the store clerk to being robbed at gun point is something that, for once, feels like a realistic reaction to this situation. When the crowd gathers outside the shop, you begin to wonder what direction the social commentary will take, but you also start to wonder whether the entire movie is going to be a hostage situation, since it obviously can't sustain that to feature film length.Then, the movie abruptly changes gears, and it becomes a sort of comedy-drama. The hostages come to like the two men who should have just given them PTSD. I don't know if it's fair to say they develop Stockholm syndrome, since they're not really hostages anymore. A large crowd has already gathered outside, including politicians as well as police.It's funny: I was glad that the whole movie wasn't spent in the hostage situation, but what we ended up with wasn't that much better. I lost interest during these scenes.In trying to make a broad comedy, de la Iglesia also apparently limited his usual shocking material; there is very little violence in this one, and perhaps one sexual scene, but no sex and very little nudity.

Fmartiterron A recent TV screening of this movie was preceded by a brief interview with director Eloy De La Iglesia. During the late 70s and 80s, De La Iglesia had became a prominent director by making a series of movies that mixed exploitation (nudity, violence) with asocial commentary. Seen today, his films are unique documents on how life was lived and perceived during that period. And unlike other filmmakers from the period, De La Iglesia is a very talented filmmaker. At his best, his films still have the gritty edge, the naturalistic approach and the poignancy that made them successful at the time. At his works, they show how thin is the line between contention and excess, between drama and exploitation.On the interview I've mentioned De La Iglesia didn't seem much appreciative of this film. He had made it with the idea of making a commercial film, something light that would earn big money. He also mentioned that critics had slammed it for being broad, which he said it was something intentional.And he is dead-on. The film starts like many of his urban dramas, with two small delinquents arriving to Vallecas and trying to assault a tobacco shop. But soon, comedy is introduced. The owner, an angry middle aged woman (an completely OTT Emma Penella) refuses to let the criminals take the money, and while the police takes siege to the shop tension and comedy escalates in both places, as the police seems hesitant to assault the shop and the hostages start to develop the Stockholm syndrome.Personally, I enjoyed the film quite much, but I finally decided that the eye De La Iglesia has for social commentary (the attitudes of police and neighbors of Vallecas are very realistic) mix together quite badly with comedy, specially in cases like this one, where the stages of the Stockholm syndrome are so poorly explained that suspension of disbelief needs to be applied in great doses.Still, it is a highly enjoyable film. Performances are fantastic, although Penella's very conscious overacting may displease some viewers. The actors playing the criminals are very good as well, and Marivel Verdú, in one of her earlier works, is lots of fun as well. We can also see Jesus Puente, a veteran Spanish actor, playing a police officer. He has one of the best dramatic moments in the movie, I won't say more.The only real problem I have with this film is, as I mentioned earlier, that comedy and drama mix very poorly, and while I enjoyed many of the dramatic scenes some of the comedy had my eyes rolling. But, of course, if you are into dramas you can always watch the rest of De La Iglesia's movies.

Mr-JAFO I've seen this movie twice or 3 times on TV, and the situation created in it is really funny: 2 men, 1 old & 1 young decide to rubber a Tobacconist in the quarter of Vallecas (Madrid). But the owner of the establishment (a mature woman) turns out to be much braver than both of them together. Inside the tobacconist´s we can also find the owner's niece (played by a very young Maribel Verdú, a bit ugly with the irons on her teeth). The young man & her, step by step, end up falling in love with each other, and the first reaction, aggressive, defending and very tense, becomes very friendly, and they all together face the Police that came there called by the tobacconist's owner.In just a few words, this is the case of "the chaser chased" but with a funny and good ending for them all.Finally, I have to say that it's very entertaining and not as tough or politically incorrect as other titles by this director. If you have some spare time & don't know how to use it, take a look at this.