Evengyny Thanks for the memories!

Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated

Console best movie i've ever seen.

Scarlet The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

emuir-1 Since when did smart dialogue have to use obscenities as adjectives? this film did not ring true as no one, wherever you go, uses the profanity and obscenities which fell out of the sewer mouths of these moronic characters and they slurped through one drink after another. They drank from morning to night yet still remained standing. Whatever became of style and wit? The film is amateurish and woefully miscast. Elijah Wood was FAR too young and cherubic to play a married man with a child. The only saving grace was Malachi McCourt who fit the part of the local Irish kingpin perfectly with a saintly appearance which belied his gangster livelihood. This was one of those heavy-handed films where what was coming next whacked you over the head without any subtlety. The film was a poor man's rip off of Saving Grace.

drednm Long, dull film with Edward Burns trying to go straight in 1980s Hell's Kitchen. He seems to be caught between the Church and two rival "mafia" families. To make matters worse, his brother (Elijah Wood) is supposed dead after killing three men even thought his bitter former girlfriend (Julie Hale) claims to have seen him in a local bar. To make things even more complicated he's had an affair with the brother's wife (Rosario Dawson). Of course Wood has been hiding in Texas but is such an idiot he comes back to New York and immediately hits the bars, thus starting a whole new round of killings.The film has no life at all despite a good music score. Endless meaningless scenes of people walking in and out of doors, up and down stairs, and loving shots of local architecture just drag this out beyond endurance. And while the Burns character might have been interested as a conflicted "hero," the other characters are so unlikable and stupid it's hard to stick with this one. Wood gives an atrocious performance and is never believable for a minute. Dawson, Hale, Oliver Platt, James Handy, Malachy McCourt, and others are OK but it's not enough. The murky interiors, ridiculous dialog, and bad acting make this the worst of Burns' film efforts. And the ending is an anticlimax because the audience has long since departed.

David I never understood what the big deal about Edward Burns was about. I mean, he surely is likable, but none of his writer-director-actor-ventures have amazed me at all. Given the right role he can do a convincing and entertaining job, but for me, that's about it."Ash Wednesday" isn't really a disaster, but it feels as if it was close to becoming one. All the way the movie feels only halfway good or bad, always going along a thin line of ambiguous quality. In the end (and especially in the final scene) the bad qualities win and the movie leaves you deeply unsatisfied.Fran (Edward Burns) lives above a bar in Hell's Kitchen. He once was a crook, but has now become "clean", which means he has a job (of which we don't see a lot) and, well, doesn't seem to kill a lot of people anymore. Three years ago his brother Shaun (Elijah Wood) killed some guys who wanted to kill Fran and vanished afterwards, presumably being dead. But now people are talking about him reappearing in the neighborhood and Fran has to deal with the rumors and his old enemies.I don't even know if this sounds interesting enough to watch the movie. When I saw it, I had no clue what it was about and maybe that was the reason it slightly intrigued me at first. But the fascination didn't last long, especially once you realize that Burns will spend a lot of time of the movie running around town talking to people. Which wouldn't be that bad, but if you listen to the dialog you realize that it gets rather repetitious.I didn't count but there must be at least 5 conversations that develop in exactly the same way. Somebody tells Fran his brother is supposed to be alive after all, he denies it, the other one doesn't believe it, both go on. This isn't the most exciting idea of communication in the first place and various instances of it doesn't make it better, but if, in addition to that, those conversations are put together so that one just follows another for half an hour, it gets rather frustrating.What is even more irritating is the complete lack of suspense here. How can any viewer seriously believe that Shaun is really dead? We're talking Elijah Wood here and that makes it pretty much 100% certain that he will sooner or later turn up in the movie again. The only point of suspense could come from the question whether Fran knows his brother is alive or not. But that's about it.And that's about much of the movie too. It takes about 30 minutes till we find out what's the deal with the dead brother. From then on nothing of importance seems to happen. There are a lot of guys who want to kill both brothers. There is Shaun's supposed widow/wife and a priest who knows a lot. All of the roles are thankless. Elijah Wood has to deliver a monologue during which may wonder if he can't deliver it convincingly or if it is written so bad that no one could deliver it. I think it's a bit of both, but the scene is either way painful to watch. Oliver Platt is also in this movie, but there is simply nothing to say about him or his role. Same goes for Rosario Dawson who..., well is just there.David Shire's music follows Burns' character for his first half of repeating the same dialog by repeating the same theme over and over again. The movie looks pale and dry, almost lifeless. There is some editing, especially in the final scene, that is inexcusable. Religious symbolism floats through the movie, looking for a place to make sense (again, especially in the last shot). The use of the F-word is so excessive, you wonder if the characters get a bonus for every time they use it. And there is one flashback scene (apart from the first one) that is as pointless as pointless can be.And then there is the end. We get a rather conventional shootout finale and think, well, that's a fine way to end a movie, even if it's not really good. But then come the last shots and it completely destroys a movie which wasn't particularly good anyway. The ending gives you no satisfaction, no sense of righteousness or penance, nothing. In the end, there is nothing really appealing to this film.

SmoothGrooves This movie is similar to most of Burns' films in both subject matter and directing. I've read through the reviews on this site and disagree with most of them. One poster said that the subject of this film was "fiction" and that the "Hell's Kitchen in this movie" has never existed. The film is based on the Irish gangs that held control over the Hell's Kitchen rackets in the 80's, primarily the Coonan & Featherstone gang The Westies (West Side Manhattan). Not only is it feasible for a father and son to make their scraps as hit men for these gangs, it is entirely likely that characters depicted in the film actually existed. The film is a crime drama, so if you don't like those kind of films, stay away. But if you do, then I would recommend this to you. Burns has a good touch with dialogue and the cinematography and the score of this film are pretty impressive. 8/10.Big Smooth