ReaderKenka
Let's be realistic.
ChanFamous
I wanted to like it more than I actually did... But much of the humor totally escaped me and I walked out only mildly impressed.
Janis
One of the most extraordinary films you will see this year. Take that as you want.
Staci Frederick
Blistering performances.
kosmasp
But having watched this as a double bill with "Killer Ants", I have to say this was the better movie. Just for the fact alone they used color filters for their lighting. It's not perfect or anything that people would show in their film school or anywhere they teach. Still there has been an effort on that technical side of it. But being a late 90s movie it is also a TV outing that looks dated in more than one way on your 16:9 TV (because it's shot in 4:3 you see).So the technical side kind of undermines itself, though I guess you can't fault it too much for that. The acting and sound design though is horrible to say the least. And not in a good way. What's really surprising though: this for some reason go treated to a sequel. No I haven't watched that
alimabean
After seeing this film, I am convinced that the people who added positive feedback about this movie are either:a) grateful to come out of their cave and see daylight, much less ever see an actual good movie...b) a storeowner who bought several copies of this video and are trying to rid themselves of them or...c) actual members of the production crew on this movie.The movie was so bad, I had to check the box to make sure this wasn't still in production. The only redeeming quality was the 3 second intro. The dialogue was horrible. Maybe it just seemed bad coming from the either whiny or monotone voices coming from the actors. This is to cinema what SAVED BY THE BELL is to intelligent comedy. Garbage.
Quigon-3
An embarrassing piece of cinematic incompetence. I've heard more compelling dialogue in laundry detergent commercials and seen better acting in Mentos ads. At no time during this reel of tripe was there even the most vague hint of suspense, character development or unpredictable sequence of events. This was a completely sophomoric attempt at film making and the result was a film with absolutely no redeeming qualities.Ishtar beware! ! ! !
maxray
I just had to comment and debunk my fellow Michigan neighbor who blasted this thriller. KILLERS was a lot of fun, well directed, produced, acted, etc. Look--I didn't pay attention to the Tarantino quote on the box -- I just wanted to see a cool story. Obviously he was looking for the 'artistic' moment, the 'subtext' the 'deeper meaning' or something. But KILLERS is not an art house flick. It's a film to turn the lights off, the volume up and grab some popcorn. I've never heard of anyone in the cast or even the director...but I can't wait to see their next film!P.S.: I'm glad to read the other comments on this page were equally happy with the film.
