Pingpong

2006
6.4| 1h29m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 01 July 2006 Released
Producted By: Junifilm
Country: Germany
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

The film shows the apparently intact world of a middle class family, whose harmonious façade crumbles due to the unexpected visit of their relative Paul, a young man of 16 years. Paul arrives looking for love and support after the suicide of his father.

Genre

Drama

Watch Online

Pingpong (2006) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Matthias Luthardt

Production Companies

Junifilm

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
Pingpong Videos and Images

Pingpong Audience Reviews

Cebalord Very best movie i ever watch
Konterr Brilliant and touching
ChanFamous I wanted to like it more than I actually did... But much of the humor totally escaped me and I walked out only mildly impressed.
Freeman This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.
Horst in Translation (filmreviews@web.de) "Pingpong" is a German movie from 10 years ago and was written and directed by Matthias Luthardt. There is a reason why he never wrote anything else again and also never directed another theatrical release. This film is a failure. The script is a complete mess and the two younger actors are horrible. Urzendowsky really only has a career and is somewhat known because of his very feminine and sensitive physicality. He is a not a talented actor at all. The two older actors in here are slightly better, but Mitterhammer has weak moments as well and Rockstroh's role is just too small to make an impact. There was not a single scene in here that felt realistic or authentic to me. But there were many bad scenes. The worst is possibly the crying scene from Urzendowsky's character. Admittedly the writing was still way worse than his performance. Let me mention a few scenes and moments that were especially cringeworthy. The sex scene was really out of nowhere. The table-tennis scenes seemed only included to justify the title. The dead dog scene at the end did not make any sense at all. The pillow scene was so random and only there for shock value. The comment by Rockstroh's character about "Doktorspiele" was the weakest moment in terms of dialogue. The raging piano player scenes did nothing for me either. This movie is packed with content that is intended to be oh so shocking and controversial and yet there is zero substance in this film. None at all. It tries so hard to make an impact that it forgets completely to deliver a compelling or realistic story. I read what Luthardt studied and it does not impress me at all. He definitely needs another lesson in subtlety. This film does not make a single artistic impact during its luckily very short under 90 minutes. A complete failure and the Cannes Film Festival loses all credibility to me for the attention and awards they gave this one. Do not watch. Highly not recommended.
Pan32 What's at play here is infighting between relatives. Paul, a moppy haired teen, arrives at his uncle Stefan's summer home unexpectedly to the obvious annoyance of Stefan's wife Anna and their son Robert.Paul's father has recently committed suicide and Paul is clearly in something of a daze. But he gradually begins to become a part of the household aided by communal walks in a nearby forest and games of pingpong with Robert.Robert is a pianist of some skill preparing for an audition for a class of young students. What becomes clear is that Robert is chafing under his mother's insistence at keeping up with his practice routine and as a result perhaps drinks rum on the sly and takes breaks to play pingpong with Paul, to his mother's annoyance.Paul is infatuated with Anna who clearly is aroused by the sight of him bare chested.Cherchez la femme as it so often is but Anna is not really a bad sort. The intimacy she shares with Paul is a token of her affection, but she fails to realize how it would affect the impressionable 16 year old still reeling from the loss of his father.Anna has understandably great ambitions for Robert but reacts in a very harsh way when he crumples under the stress.Paul takes his revenge for what he sees as a betrayal by Anna by drowning Anna's cherished dog,Schumann.Uncle Stefen is too busy with work to realize the self destruction going on in his household.Sebastian Urzendowsky as Paul and Marion Mitterhammer as Anna give particularly fine performances in this interesting film.
federovsky An emotionally disturbed teenager turns up at the home of some repressed relatives. This simple substrate economically combines a surprising number of subtle issues: grief, boredom, alcoholism, stress, lust, and homosexuality, amounting to quite a timebomb in a deceptively domestic situation. It has a dusky, brooding quality - feeling almost like a mild version of Funny Games or Visitor Q.The boy is dealing with his father's recent suicide and an evident sense of abandonment resulting in various behavioural phenomena that sociologists will have terms for. His cousin's family has its own emotional issues, a neurotic, artistic mother and son, the latter on the booze while practising Berg's piano sonata (providing a sophisticated tone) for an audition; his mother a bored housewife of impulsive passion. Sounds of mastication are used frequently - repulsive, but it lends a surreal, intimate effect.With so many issues at play though, the meaning is muddled. Frustration, disillusionment, nihilism, betrayal and revenge blur any over-riding theme, which most likely is the new preoccupation of the age: insecurity. Sensitisation of society is on the upcreep. Having set up their lives of suburban serenity, they have too much to lose - everything becomes unbearably precious and the effort of keeping together what was so laboriously acquired causes mild derangement in the most ordinary people. Mild derangement is very much the order of the day here.It wends its way slowly and interestingly enough, but the somewhat degenerate ending undermines much of what the film was surely trying to achieve along the way. If the boy was merely sociopathic, then much of the useful meaning is eroded. Still, it's worthwhile art-house fair that will stay in the mind on account of its hermetic, drifting, almost dreamlike quality.
jen-kollmer There were a few moments in this film that I didn't buy (I won't say what--no spoilers here), but that's what happens when you take risks on screen. Tone-wise, I'd say this film was like American Beauty, but done much better. There were still some over-the-top moments, but unlike the Alan Ball/Sam Mendes mega-hit, parts of this film feel genuine. The script was juggling many nuanced through-lines, and did so surprisingly well.Solid acting. Nice control of the camera--and the HD-to-35mm blowup looked pretty darn nice.I'd like to see more from this director.