Gutsycurene Fanciful, disturbing, and wildly original, it announces the arrival of a fresh, bold voice in American cinema.

Invaderbank The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

Kirandeep Yoder The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

Kinley This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

smoothhoney1265 This movie at first was a clear but now is a difficult case for me. Like probably all people who see this film for the first time, I saw "The Prince and Me" first and this second film is way worse than the first film.The major problem, of course, is that they exchanged almost all of the main cast. This makes it difficult to identify with the story and the characters. Also, it is very obviously that Luke Mably really didn't want to be in this one (and I can understand why he didn't).The plot is thin, Paige is annoying, Edvard looks repulsed most of the time, and all the other characters are just ridiculous.That was a while ago. In the meantime I have seen the film about three times. On my free will. What did change my mind? Simple: It was one actor. Jonathan Firth. In my opinion, he is the most elegant, sweet and sensitive character in this film. A real joy to watch. And basically the reason you like watching the whole film in the end.Because it seems with brilliant actors that, their talent, and the heart they put into the role seems to rub off on the characters and the plot. In his calm and careful presence, Paige suddenly becomes a soft and likable personality, Edvard becomes sarcastic instead of depressed and the bitch of the film seems even bitchier.So, in the end I can say: "The Prince and Me 2" is really a bad film. BUT Jonathan Firth's performance is worth every minute and you have missed something if you haven't seen him in it.

Lærke Thomsen I just saw this movie, and as a Dane, I'm offended and disappointed. It was just so... bad! The plot seemed unoriginal, the cast was .. well, disappointing, and what happened to Paige's hair? Movie 1 it was brown and straight, but now it's unnaturally curly and blond? And the actor? Kam Heskin? Not really...But what I had the biggest problem with was that this was supposed to be about a Danish prince, and that most of the movie is supposed to take place in Denmark, yet there were no Danish actors (in the first there was at least one), and the actors who where supposed to be Danish couldn't even speak Danish properly, and they almost didn't speak the language at all! I know Danish is a hard language to learn and to speak, the Queen of Denmark's husband doesn't even speak it that well after many years in Denmark, but then you need to employ at least A FEW Danes, instead of just teaching the actors a few words.Most of the characters' names weren't good either. I don't know if the writer researched Denmark or Norway and Sweeden when finding names, but names like Rosalind and Edward are very rare, and not exactly typical royal names. Harald is not common either, at least not in Denmark. One of our princes' is name Felix! Joachim! Christian! Frederik! I have a whole list of this that seem wrong about the movie from a Danish perspective, I just needed to vent a few.It just really annoys me that they couldn't take the time to make an effort. I heard the first movie was inspired by the love story of our future king and queen, Frederik and Mary, and in that case, I'm offended on behalf of the royal Danish family.Gads, that movie was bad.

Adelina N Why? Why did they make this movie! It's so predictable and bad that I switched of the TV after the first 15 minutes. But then I decided to finish watching and it was a disappointment! While the first movie was in my opinion great and I still watch it sometimes, the second one is a disaster! Thank God it was aired on TV and I hadn't bought a DVD (but I wanted). It would have been a complete waste of money! I didn't like the second Paige and I compared her with the amazing Julia Stiles. The thing about the "Book" was copied from "Princess Diaries", the main characters didn't have a chemistry, Paige's rival was sooooo bad!!!!! And the King and the Queen didn't resemble monarchs!!!! How could that possibly be!

Regina Lin I usually have higher tolerance with sequels since we both know how hard it is to make a good sequel,but this one is TOO AWFUL TO TOLERATE under any circumstances. If you can't have your original cast in a sequel,at least find someone as good as the old one.I find myself picking at the new Paige's over-acting and gaudy appearance all the time.The original Paige was very smart and confident,who's so determined and brave about what she really wants.That's so lovable and inspiring for the audience.Julia Stiles does know how to portray these characters as a civilian queen-to-be. On the other hand,the new Paige has no personality at all.She has nothing for the audience.I don't feel sorry for her at all when she's struggling in this relationship cause I don't even think they're in love,even just a little bit.Persuading the audience is one of the essential parts of acting!!!!!! Apparently,Kam Heskin doesn't know how to be Paige.She's not special or gorgeous enough for the audience to accept her as Paige,especially Julia Stiles made such an excellent precedent.So,maybe I should go easy on her cause I think she might be pretty regretful as well.Just look at her hairstyle and the wedding dress!Looks extremely cheap and low budget!I'll never believe a queen will wear stuff like that!I just don't buy it! If you ever watched Prince&I and very found of it,I strongly recommend you not to watch this sequel.Cause you might die from over disappointed! If you never watched Prince&I,you really should do whatever you can think of instead of watching this.